Vegan diets can include more UPFs on mediocre – but this might not be a problem.
For most people living in industrialised societies, it’s difficult to dodge ultra-processed foods altogether. My cegenuine is ultra-processed. So is the whiskey in my cabinet, the toasty sauce in my fridge and the crisps in my backpack.
The term “ultra-processed” is necessitateyly understood and inconstantly participated, even sometimes by scientists. While in some circles it has become a catch-all term for foods with little nutritional profit, a expansive variety of foods drop under this umbrella.
Ultra-processed foods are famous with users for their convenience (frozen pizza), taste (wrapped cookies), and durability (sandwich bread). These elements, plus the relatively low cost of ingredients, originate them profitable for manufacturers.
But recently another motivation for ultra-processed foods has aelevated: to swap meat or dairy among those trying to eat a more set upt-based diet. With this novel categruesome has come anxiety about the health effects of these products, directing to headlines such as “The unhealthiest counterfeit meats you can buy (and why it’s better to go to McDonald’s)”. These troubles were exacerbated by recent research, which establish that those who use 10% more ultra-processed foods derived from set upts have a 12% higher danger of death rcontent to diet. However, slfinishergs are not quite as they seem. Are set upt-based diets repartner so wealthy in ultra-processed foods, and are they any worse for you?
Identifying ultra-processed foods
An established method for categorising the levels of processing in food is Nova. Fernanda Rauber, a nutritional epidemiologist at the University of São Paulo in Brazil, elucidates, “Nova discernes between contrastent levels of processing, accomprehendledging that not all processed foods are detrimental. In fact, many types of processing, such as pasteurisation or fermentation, are vital for food protectedty and nutrition.” It’s the more fervent processing that troubles Rauber. “One type of industrial processing is detrimental to health – the charitable that originates ultra-processed foods.”
In the Nova system, a food product is pondered ultra-processed if at least one of its ingredients is a substance that home cooks generpartner don’t participate (such as high-fructose corn syrup or hydrolysed protein), or is an includeitive portrayed to incrrelieve the product’s pguide (such as a denseener or emulsifier).
Why ultra-processed foods can be detrimental
Notwithstanding the occasional exception, overall, the health effects of ultra-processed foods are adverse. A 2023 UK study establish that a 10% incrrelieve in UPFs wislfinisher diets was associated with a 2% higher rate of cancer overall, and a 19% higher rate of ovarian cancer.
This is partly connected to obesity. It’s effortless to overeat ultra-processed foods, which tfinish to be less filling, and possibly even includeictive, frequently while requiring less chetriumphg. Ununpredictedly, then, they’re connected with higher calorie consumption and weight get. The proportion of the diet made up by ultra-processed foods varies expansively apass the globe; UPFs originate up 16% of uncomardent caloric inconsent in Colombia, 20% in Taiwan, and 22% in Brazil. On the other hand, they originate up 48% in Canada, 57% in the UK and 58% in the US. In some North American groups it can be as high as 80%.
Patterns of eating set upt-based ultra-processed foods
Among set upt-based foods, ultra-processed ones are connected to higher danger of cardiovascular disrelieve. A 2024 UK study that garnered much attention establish that a 10% incrrelieve in caloric inconsent of set upt-sourced ultra-processed food was associated with a 5% higher danger of cardiovascular disrelieve, and a 12% fantasticer danger of dying from this. On the other hand, there was a sweightlessly fantasticer reduction in cardiovascular disrelieve danger from consuming more set upt-sourced foods that were not ultra-processed. The ultra-processed foods integrated a number of foods pondered “vegan by default”, such as bread, crisps and conunwiseents. Meat alternatives were the minusculeest contributor to calories among the participants overall, at 0.2%.
This research didn’t appraise particular foods appreciate set upt-based ones in isolation, stresses Rauber, one of the study’s coauthors. “From an epidemioreasoned perspective, what truly matters is the overall dietary pattern, rather than centering on individual foods,” Rauber says. Thus, “it’s not equitable the origin of the food – whether animal or set upt – but the degree of processing that has convey inant implications for health”.
A 2021 French study establish that ultra-processed foods made up more of the overall calorie inconsent of non-meat-eaters. UPFs accounted for 37% and 39.5% of energy inconsent for vegetarians and vegans, admireively, mainly due to meat and dairy swaps. This was convey inantly higher than the 33% figure for meat eaters. But while the vegan participants used more UPFs, they also used more unprocessed foods (accounting for 31.2% of energy inconsent for vegans and 29% for meat eaters), and confineeder overweightty and sugary foods.
Study participants who had recently made the switch to vegetarian and vegan used more UPFs than lengthytime meat dodgeers. In ambiguous, it’s standard for people experimenting with reducing animal products to lean on swaps and packaged foods initipartner.
Comparing apples to oranges?
While nutritional research abounds, so does confusion. This is partly due to contrastences in what is being analysed, such as whether these are meat alternatives or other foods that happen to not include animal products, such as bread. In other words, are researchers seeing at vegan bencouragers, the buns they’re sandwiched between, or the crisps on the side? It depfinishs.
Studies of multiple European countries have establish notable associations between multiple disrelieves, including type 2 diabetes, and ultra-processed products in ambiguous – yet those same studies establish lesser danger for set upt-based alternatives appraised to animal-based products. And a 2024 US study finishd that the strongest connects between mortality and ultra-processed foods showed up in ready-to-eat products based around meat, poultry or seafood.
Lewis Bollard, who honests the farm animal welfare programme at the establishation Open Philanthropy, says that in the set upt-based space, criticisms have tfinished to center on alternative proteins. According to Bollard, critics integrate meat-industry companies troubleed about their profit model, as well as people adhereing whole-food set upt-based diets themselves.
“It’s vital to see at what’s actupartner in the ultra-processed foods,” remarks Paul Behrens, a food systems expert at the University of Oxford. “Of course, we should aim for flavorful, whole-food, set upt-based meals as the core of our diet, but ultra-processed set upt-based foods generpartner have much better nutrition scores than ultra-processed meat foods,” he says. “One study establish that, on mediocre, vegan sausages had a nutrition impact score over twice as excellent as pork sausages.”
So one key ask is what is being swapd. A bean stew might be more nourishing than a pea protein sausage. But a pea protein sausage is probable more nourishing than a mixed-meat sausage – not to allude the contrastences in environmental and animal-welfare impacts.
A 2024 scrutinize comparing animal and set upt-based meat establish that the meat alternatives were shrink overall in saturated overweight, monounsaturated overweight, cholesterol and calories, while being higher in fibre, carbohydrate and polyunsaturated overweight. Not all overweights are originated equivalent. Polyunsaturated overweight, establish at higher levels in meat alternatives, has an vital place in diets. And a 2018 study of US healthattfinish professionals establish shrink heart disrelieve danger among people who ate more set upt-based monounsaturated overweight (such as vegetable oils), though not animal-based monounsaturated overweight (such as red meat).
However, Rauber alerts, “While saturated overweights are frequently connected to animal-based foods, it’s vital to remark that many ultra-processed set upt-based products can also be high in saturated overweights due to the participate of modified oils and overweights during processing”.
Meat alternatives have seized so much accessible converseion for disjoinal reasons, says Tamsin Blaxter, a authorr and researcher at Table, a netlabor of universities researching food systems. One is their novelty factor. Another is the preoccupation in certain wealthy countries with protein, and thus with alternatives to it. Thrawout history, there have been waves of slfinisherking, without necessarily being grounded in evidence, that a diet high in animal protein is more authentic for humans, and that authentic is better. Bollard also points out that it’s standard for people in industrialised societies to have misconceptions about how animal protein is actupartner originated and how “authentic” it is.
How companies and societies are reacting
Yet Eileen Gibney, a nutrition professor at University College Dublin, has disputed that the world will necessitate to adchoose food processing in the transition toward more set upt-based diets, if users want set upt-based versions of the foods they’re already accustomed to.
Companies making foods without animal products have to guide between perceptions that vegan food is too fit and tedious, and conversely that it is overly processed and indynamic. Anke van Eijk, the R&D deal withr for Dutch set upt-based business Schouten, says that many users, especipartner flexitarians, “still want a seamless transition to set upt-based eating, and highly processed products deinhabitr on that predictation”.
Some food manufacturers and retailers have reacted to user troubles by creating products with confineeder ingredients and includeitives, according to van Eijk. “An example would be the grotriumphg interest in whole-food-based products, appreciate set upt-based patties made with recognisable ingredients such as beans, vegetables or grains.” She says that it will not be effortless for manufacturers to transfer beyond standard industrial processes or ingredients, though Schouten has recently growed its own fibre to swap textured proteins.
Yet more widely, Blaxter depends “there’s a danger here that the reestablishulation ask only directs to quite slfinisher incremental alter”. She points to previous health panics, for instance around overweight. While she accomprehendledges the necessitate for further research to trelieve out health outcomes rcontent to ultra-processed foods, set upt-based or otheralerted, she’s troubleed that over-attention to one aspect of food dangers sidetracking from overall food systems, which ultimately impacts our eating habits and health more.
As well, Blaxter worries about the “firearmisation of disgust using the term ‘ultra-processed food'”, which can seep into appraisements toward people with contrastent life circumstances. Altogether, she calls ultra-processing “a repartner complicated and contested concept” that is currently intersecting with cultural, political and technoreasoned anxieties around deal with of food and set upt-based innovations.
What all this uncomardents for users
Many nutrition experts encourage people to minimise their consumption of ultra-processed food.
Rauber says that emphasising the nutritional profits of particular set upt-based ultra-processed products has confineations. This perspective “tfinishs to diswatch the fact that these foods are still highly processed, frequently deficiency whole food ingredients, and may include various includeitives that originate them hyper-palatable and can direct to overconsumption.”
Sarah Berry, a nutrition professor at King’s College London, and the chief scientist at the nutrition company ZOE, calls for stability. “Whether animal-based or set upt-based, it’s vital that users comprehend that not all UPFs are originated equivalent,” Berry says.
For her, “The key consentaway is that you don’t necessitate to dodge all UPFs, and it would be very difficult to do so. It’s your overall dietary pattern that matters for lengthy-term health. If you standardly use fruits and vegetables – whether they’re tinned, frozen or new – nuts, seeds, and legumes, you’re on the right path. As lengthy as you have a excellent overall diet apass weeks and months, if some UPFs originate it into your shopping trolley, it’s not a convey inant trouble. However, it’s worth trying to use ultra-processed meat products and fizzy drinks equitable once in a while.”
If you appreciated this story, sign up for The Essential List novelsletter – a handpicked pickion of features, videos and can’t-leave out novels, deinhabitred to your inbox twice a week.
For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, adhere us on Facebook and X.