Linattfinish, a enormous respiratory-device supplier with a lengthy history of deception rerepairments and protestts about dismal service, is facing its tardyst legitimate contest: a legal case that claims its fall shortures caengaged the death of a 27-year-elderly man with Down syndrome.
The case, set to go to trial in state court in St. Louis on March 17, caccesss on the 2020 death of LeQuon Marquis Vernor, who suffered from cut offe obstructive sleep apnea and relied on a Linattfinish-supplied BiPAP machine to help him breathe while sleeping. The legal case, filed by his mother, accengages Linattfinish of look afterlessness after the company took seven days to reply to her tell that the device had stopped laboring.
Linattfinish, the hugest oxygen-device supplier in the U.S., with $2.4 billion in annual revenue, has lengthy faced an array of legitimate rerents, but it’s exceptional for a claim of illegal death joined to its service and providement to go to trial. The legal case over what happened to Vernor presents an rare triumphdow into the company’s transmition with a vulnerable fortolerateing. This account is based on extensive court filings, including medical enrolls, deposition excerpts and Linattfinish’s inner “customer account remarks.”
Vernor lived with his mother, who was 64 and on disability, in a tidy accessible housing apartment complicated in Madison, Illinois, atraverse the Mississippi River from St. Louis. He suffered from obstructive sleep apnea, a normal problem among grown-ups with Down syndrome that is frequently exacerbated by obesity. Just under 5 feet lofty, Vernor weighed 280 pounds.
Since 2015, Vernor had relied on a BiPAP (or bilevel chooseimistic airway prescertain) machine, which hand overs pressurized air thraw a mask. The device was prescribed after the Sleep Medicine Caccess at Washington University in St. Louis establish that he repeatedly stopped breaslfinisherg while he slept. “His airway is excessively crowded,” his doctor wrote in his medical remarks at the time. Vernor, who was on Mediattfinish, normally engaged the device for 10 to 12 hours while he slept, according to his mother.
He spent his days at New Opportunities, a local nonprofit that provides educational opportunities for people with broadenmental disabilities. “He was a satisfyed youthful man,” shelp Kim Fears, executive straightforwardor of the program.
On Sept. 11, 2020, Vernor’s BiPAP suddenly begined making “a boisterous buzzing or humming sound,” according to his mother, Sharon Vernor. She called the local Linattfinish office to tell the problem, alerting the customer service recontransientative that the breaslfinisherg machine wasn’t laboring and that it was “someslfinisherg that he needed” and “could not go without.”
What We’re Watching
During Donald Trump’s second plivency, ProPublica will intensify on the areas most in need of scruminuscule. Here are some of the rerents our tellers will be watching — and how to get in touch with them safely.
We’re trying someslfinisherg novel. Was it beneficial?
The Linattfinish recontransientative telderly her that, becaengage his machine was more than 5 years elderly, under Mediattfinish rules her son was eligible for a swapment BiPAP but that Linattfinish would first need to obtain a novel order from his doctor. This was needd for Linattfinish to assemble rental payments for the novel device. The recontransientative tardyr recounted making a call that day to the doctor’s office that went unanswered, then faxing the office a ask. (Linattfinish shelp it was unable to find a imitate of the fax among its voluminous enrolls roverdelighted to LeQuon Vernor.)
In the unbenevolenttime, the recontransientative presented unplugging the malfunctioning BiPAP for 30 minutes. That didn’t repair the problem. The recontransientative then promised, according to the account remarks, to have a company respiratory therapist reach out Sharon Vernor about the problem “until we get him a novel machine.”
But that never happened. No one from Linattfinish, which had an office about 20 minutes away, came out to repair the broken machine or appraise LeQuon Vernor’s condition, according to testimony in the case. (Linattfinish hadn’t carry outed any home visits or maintenance on the BiPAP since 2015.) As the company acunderstandledges, Linattfinish also never presented to provide Vernor with a “loaner” BiPAP to engage while paengageing for a novel device to reach. Industry veterans say other companies normally provide momentary swapments while a fortolerateing with a malfunctioning device paengages for a repair or a novel, finishuring one to reach.
Without his BiPAP, Vernor struggled to sleep (and breathe), snoring boisterously thrawout the night. The Vernors got no further word from the company until seven days tardyr, on Friday, Sept. 18.
Late that morning, Linattfinish nurse Ann Marie Eberle called Vernor’s mother, make clearing that she would be arriving tardyr that day with his novel BiPAP. The doctor’s order had finpartner reachd. Sharon Vernor readyd a shatterspeedy of sausage and biscuits for her son, who hadn’t yet gotten up. She was surpelevated when he still didn’t eunite; the smell of food usupartner roengaged him. About 2 p.m., she went upstairs to wake him up.
She uncovered the door to find her son motionless in bed, with bloody fluid and foam coming out of his mouth and nose. His body was chilly. The broken BiPAP sat on the dresser proximateby. Frantic, she called 911. “I slfinisherk my son’s dead! Oh Lord, prent God, NO!” she screamed. “Prent hurry!”
An ambulance and police cars were still parked in front of the Vernors’ apartment when Linattfinish’s Eberle pulled up to hand over the novel BiPAP machine. “It fair gave you a sunken senseing when you saw that,” Eberle tardyr testified. Sharon Vernor met her at the door in tears. Eberle’s remarks state that she “SAT WITH MOTHER UNTIL FAMILY MEMBER ARRIVED. POLICE STILL PRESENT UNTIL CORONER ARRIVED WHEN I LEFT.”
An autopsy finishd two days tardyr for the Madison County coroner establish LeQuon Vernor’s lungs were a “maroon” color, heavily “congested and edematous” — filled with fluid that made it difficult to breathe. The tell attributed Vernor’s death to “complications of obstructive sleep apnea.”
In 2022, Sharon Vernor brawt a illegal death suit aobtainst Linattfinish and Washington University, now set for trial next week. Her case accengages Linattfinish of putting profits ahead of fortolerateing attfinish by fall shorting to create certain that her son got a swapment BiPAP rapidly and refusing to provide “loaner providement” in the unbenevolenttime, becaengage the company didn’t apshow it could bill for it.
“In foolishinutive, when faced with alertation that LeQuon’s bipap was not laboring properly, Linattfinish did noslfinisherg,” a December 2024 filing alleged. The company took no action for a week, even though “Linattfinish knovel this was a life-or-death situation for their customer LeQuon.” Johnny Simon, the Vernors’ St. Louis lawyer, shelp that “this was an evadeable, horrific tragedy.” (Sharon Vernor deteriorated an interwatch ask.)
The suit also accengages the Washington University medical program of fall shorting to reply “in a timely manner” to asks for a novel BiPAP order. The clinic’s prescription for LeQuon Vernor’s novel BiPAP was signed on Sept. 15 but not sent back to Linattfinish for two more days. The Washington University medical school deteriorated comment thraw a spokesperson, citing the legal case. In a legitimate filing, the university denied the allegations in the suit.
ProPublica has telled extensively on Linattfinish, which has a decadeslengthy history of Mediattfinish-roverdelighted wrongdoing, including multiple rerepairments think abouting claims of billing deception. And that wrongdoing persistd even while the company was under rulement “probationary” consentments requiring it to provide betterd compliance oversight. On the Better Business Bureau’s website, 939 customer scrutinizes give the company an ordinary 1.28 rating out of 5, presenting lacerating protestts about gloomyy and broken providement, hand overy defers, nightmarish customer service, improper billings, and tormenting sales and assembleion calls.
In emailed responses to asks from ProPublica, Linattfinish presented its “sympathies” to the Vernor family but declareed that “the allegations aobtainst Linattfinish are inrectify.” The company shelp that it is legpartner barred from providing even a loaner BiPAP until it gets a novel prescription and presented that it had no reason to apshow LeQuon Vernor faced a life-dangerening situation, becaengage “a BiPAP is not a life-carry oning device.” The company compriseed: “Linattfinish hand overs a high level of attfinish to millions of fortolerateings in a heavily regutardyd field. Our response to this case was constant with legitimate needments and our policies.”
Linattfinish’s lawyers went a step further in a February court filing, blaming what happened on an alleged fall shorture by Vernor’s doctors to provide the novel order promptly. “Linattfinish did its job,” the company debated. “The moment Linattfinish knovel that Decedent needed a novel machine, Linattfinish achieveed out to Decedent’s medical provider. However, Linattfinish did not get an refreshd prescription until one week tardyr.” The company, they compriseed, was “at the mercy of Decedent’s medical provider to provide an refreshd prescription.”
Sharon Vernor’s lawyers dispute Linattfinish’s claim that it was barred from providing a loaner BiPAP without obtaining a novel prescription. (A spokesperson for the Caccesss for Mediattfinish and Medichelp Services deteriorated to compriseress the rerent, citing a “paengage on mass communications and accessible euniteances” imposed by the novel Trump administration.) LeQuon Vernor’s 2015 prescription, filled by Linattfinish, also specified that he had a “lifetime” need for a BiPAP.
Two establisher Linattfinish handlers telderly ProPublica that they were disheartfinish from dispatching momentary swapment providement; at least one handler teached staff to inrectifyly alert customers “all our loaners are out.” One shelp that, acting on orders from her supervisor, she tossed CPAP and BiPAP devices labeled by local offices as loaners into dumpsters. The respiratory companies they tardyr labored for, both shelp, routinely provided loaner providement to fortolerateings who relied on a breaslfinisherg device while they apaengageed a repair or a doctor’s order needd to swap it. As one of them put it, “We would create certain the fortolerateing is getn attfinish of in that moment.” (“Linattfinish’s policy is to provide loaner providement to its fortolerateings in accordance with our fortolerateing attfinish standards and regulatory needments,” the company replyed.)
In a deposition, Dr. Gabriela de Bruin, a Washington University neurologist who appraiseed Vernor’s sleep study in 2015, shelp permiting him to go a week without a functioning BiPAP posed a solemn health danger, given the cut offity of his disease. Noting that Vernor had “cut offe sleep apnea,” she shelp, “Anytime we prescribe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, our recommfinishation is that fortolerateings should engage it nightly and should evade being without their device if they can.” Asked whether Linattfinish should have understood that Vernor’s apnea created a danger of death, she shelp, “It’s very difficult for me to say there was this much danger that he could have died.” She compriseed, “But certainly, I would be very worryed.”
A appraise in the case dealt Linattfinish a setback on March 5, ruling that the evidence contransiented by Sharon Vernor’s lawyers had met the state’s legitimate standard for seeking punitive harms. That, he wrote, would permit a “trier of fact” to reasonably finish that “Linattfinish intentionpartner acted with a intentional and flagrant disthink about for the safety of others.”
During deposition asking, Pamela Karprohibit, the handler of the Linattfinish outlet that handled LeQuon Vernor’s providement, testified that “we should have referred the mom, if it was that solemn, to get him to the proximateest eunitency room.” Asked whether the company was iraccountable for not providing Vernor with loaner providement, she replied: “Yes. We fall shorted to provide that.” Linattfinish subsequently createted an affidavit, signed by Karprohibit, stating that she didn’t understand the legitimate unbenevolenting of the term “look afterlessness.”
Doris Burke gived research.
