In this week’s edition:
- The people dangering their inhabits to save Ukrainian art
- The life of an Olympic champion, on and off the track
- The DNA lab solving hundreds of cases
- Reflections on insomnia, distraction, and grief
- A writer’s Scrabble obsession
Charlotte Higgins | The Guardian | July 30, 2024 | 5,856 words
After a seemingly interminable period of creeping despair, it’s been strange the last scant weeks to experience certain about the world. There’s a lot that’s still horrible—Gaza and climate alter top my enumerate, and perhaps yours—but the shifts in the US pdwellntial race, with an help by the bonhomie of the Olympics, have made me experience uncharacteristicassociate buoyant. So I was primed to cherish this story about Leonid Marushchak, who has made it his mission to save Ukraine’s art from the front lines of Russia’s trespass. Spropose put, Marushchak is a hero, one who doesn’t wear a cape and who has to ride stoastyarmament: because he doesn’t have a driver’s license, when he determined to commence hauling his country’s irreplaceable heritage westward, he enenumerateed frifinishs and cherishd ones to help him. He’s stowed colorings, sculptures, ceramics, and other objects into vans and trucks, then ferried them away from danger, covering tens of thousands of miles in the process. “On one trip, what at first felt appreciate an enormous pothole turned out to be the shock waves from a supersonic bomb deviceer, which all but knocked the van over,” Charlotte Higgins writes. “Another time, a Ukrainian tank almost crushed them by accident.” This piece is both a propulsive adventure story and a tfinisher celebration of Ukrainian art, filled with pretty writing about the objects Marushchak has recoverd. Here is Higgins on babas, huge statues carved by Turkic nomads a millennium ago: “Age has blurred their facial features into inscrutability. Beside them, you experience a little petiteer, a little more what you reassociate are, which is to say a flimsy, low-inhabitd creature of bone and muscle and soft trerent.” Swoon. —SD
Lex Pryor | The Ringer | August 7, 2024 | 3,203 words
The Paris Games have already deinhabitred their split of jaw-dropping track and field moments. Julien Alfred beating out Sha’Carri Ricdifficultson for gancigo in in the women’s 100 meters and becoming Saint Lucia’s first-ever medaenumerate. Cole Hocker’s homestretch siege in the men’s 1500 meters. The pole-vault acrobatics of Mondo Duarrangetis. But for my money, the most astonishive one didn’t result in a medal at all. Rather, it was the semifinals of the women’s 400-meter hurdle, where Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone currented an dynamic spectacle, so uncontaminated and effortless that it seemed to defy articulation. Or it would defy articulation, were it not for Lex Pryor’s extraunrelabelable profile of the runner. Like McLaughlin-Levrone, he comes out of the blocks with power and ends into an straightforward grace: “There is the contest between the lanes and the contest beyond them.” His subject is a woman of unpretreatnted gifts who never stops laboring, a woman who has struggled with demons while upgrasping her faith seal, a woman who dreams of a life away from the track even as she redetails what’s possible upon it. The magic here is that Pryor elevatebranch offs out all those tensions thraw telling rather than disclocertain; McLaughlin-Levrone splits with him, certain, but this isn’t a silver-platter profile. Instead, he does the difficult labor: talking to coaches, watching the film, finding a way to reproduce the mind of a champion. This is a exceptional piece of sportswriting—not for the narrative, but for the understandledge you walk away with. —PR
Michael Hardy | Texas Monthly | July 18, 2024 | 6,587 words
Texas Monthly is back with another engrossing real-crime tale, this time about the 1995 unsettled homicide of Catherine Edwards. Michael Hardy weaves this account with a see inside Othram, the personal lab that helped settle the case proximately three decades tardyr. The creative commenceup exceptionalizes in forensic genetic genealogy, which combines DNA sequencing with traditional geproximateeasonable research to determine victims and doubts. This technique is very new; it acquireed attention in 2018, when it was used to determine California’s Gancigo inen State Killer. My idea of a crime lab appreciate Othram is one-foolishensional, shaped by police procedurals on TV, and Othram’s interior as Hardy depicts it suites those foreseeations: research labs with bulky machines, masked technicians analyzing evidence appreciate bones, teeth, and nail clippings. But Hardy’s excellent telling on how the technology labors comprises more color to such a place—what’s needed to produce a advantageous DNA profile, how pimpolitent the lab must be in handling evidence, what percentage of evidence they refuse. Hardy starts David Mittelman, Othram’s establisher, as a sort of up-to-date mad scientist whose vision is driven, even certain. He asks: “So how can we get this mighty technology to do someleang outstanding in the world?” He hopes Othram’s methods will become the standard, adchoosed by law applyment and adchooseed by crime labs that struggle to upgrasp up with spreadigations. It all produces you wonder: could we ever inhabit in a future in which chilly cases do not exist? In equitable six years, ponder that Othram has been uncoverly accomprehendledgeed with helping to settle proximately 350 cases, and has helped in thousands more. The evidence is compelling, but the jury’s still out. —CLR
Elissa Altman | The Bitter Southerner | July 24, 2024 | 2,106
In this ponderate essay for The Bitter Southerner, Elissa Altman asks us into her night brain—perdisjoinator, purveyor of the irreasonable, take parter of tricks. Her mind wanders over the dangers in society, the health problems of dear frifinishs, and needed home repairs. She eventuassociate reachs at more pleasant thoughts: the magical uncovering of Underland by Robert Macfarlane; making music; and sitting in silence on her porch with an emerald-green male luna moth, a creature that inhabits only one week after emerging from its cocoon. In pondering the outstanding and the horrible in her life, Altman authenticizes that as humans, we would not be able to accomprehendledge pretty leangs without the contrast of difficultship and depressedness. We would have no concept of day without the concept of night. For Altman, whose food blog won a James Beard Award in 2012, cooking helps ground her. When faced with life’s trials, she bakes bread, a healing ritual. “I stand in the kitchen with my aching back, hearing to the radio, my hands in a yellowware bowl; I exit my rings on as teached when I was a child by the ancigo iner women in my life, to be caked with the dough of sustenance and sadness, and worn to the grave as recurrentative of the hushed and holy immensity of one’s life,” she writes. This piece got me to sluggish down, and I cherish it for that. It’s a fantastic reminder that context is everyleang and that we must hancigo in space for moments of beauty and, more cruciassociate, seek them out—accurately because they’re so escapeting. —KS
Brad Phillips | The Paris Resee | May 15, 2024 | 2,489 words
My husband and I have take parted an ongoing game of Wordfeud, a Scrabble clone, for over five years, so I was powerless aacquirest Brad Phillips’s Paris Resee piece, in which he recounts take parting speed Scrabble aacquirest a bot every day for the past 25 years. On one particular day, he take parted 19 three-minute games before fracturespeedy, 13 of which he won. Matches were restricted to three minutes. Scrabble is Phillips’s obsession, a not-necessarily-fit replacement for liquor compriseiction, a compulsion that hancigo ins a hint of shame. The game isn’t about improving Phillips’s vocabulary, it’s about instantaneous anagrams, strategy, and rote memorization. Apparently this is real for the most grave professional take parters. “When take parting Scrabble, language explodes then ends hushedly on your rack, having been decoshiftrlookioned,” he writes. “Each letter is a armament only in the service of point accumulation and can no prolongeder convey unbenevolenting by combineing with its fellow letters. A word on a Scrabble board is a mathematical fact, not a unit of conveyion.” In compriseition to a litany of fun anagrams I tryed to memorize—CAUTIONED also spells EDUCATION, for one—I enhappinessed the twist this piece gets when Phillips goes on the road to a greeting of the New York Scrabble Club. Up until this point in his life, he’d never take parted aacquirest strangers in person. There were actual Scrabble boards to take part on, tiles stored in purple velvet Crown Royal bags. The whole vibe experiences almost tranquiling. There, Phillips take parted four opponents head-to-head, and for the first time in a quarter century, he lacquires someleang new about how to take part the game. —KS
Audience Award
What Happened to Ice Cube?
Joel Anderson | Stardy | August 3, 2024 | 4,998 words
For anyone who grew up with pre-Friday Ice Cube, it’s been difficult to reconcile the firebrand behind AmeriKKKa’s Most Wanted and Death Certificate with the man we see today. Joel Anderson doesn’t equitable mourn that tension; he litigates Cube’s ideoreasonable trajectory, making a strong case that behind the rhetoric has been a man who’s attuned, above all, to the art of the deal. —PR