‘The Apprentice’s Sebastian Stan & Jeremy Strong On Their “Horror Movie”

To say that Sebastian Stan and Jeremy Strong, stars of The Apprentice, have been riding a rollercoaster together would be someskinnyg of an lessenment. From sleepless nights contemplating embodying a juvenileer Donald Trump and his mentor Roy Cohn, to a Cannes Film Festival premiere filled with high hopes, a finish and desist from Trump himself, deafening silence from U.S. distributors, a reprieve from Briarcliff Entertainment, a highly combustible liberate on the eve of the U.S. Pdwellntial election, and now an Oscar nomination each, they might well be suffering from whiplash.

Here, they met with Deadline to converse how they’ve steerd the ride of the past restricted months, where they experience the film inhabits in the accessible consciousness, and what it unbenevolents to them to get Oscar nominations in the current political climate, for take parting the Pdwellnt and his timely collaborator Cohn.

SEBASTIAN STAN: I enjoy the haircut.

JEREMY STRONG: Thanks.

DEADLINE: A buzzcut suits you. What’s the story there?

STRONG: My hair was not my own for a extfinished time. And when I wrapped this last film, I buzzed it off… wiskinny minutes.

DEADLINE: This was your Jon Landau role in Deinhabitr Me from Nowhere, the Springsteen biopic?

STRONG: Yeah.

DEADLINE: What a time this has been for you both. And here you are with Oscar nominations, after all the ups and downs The Apprentice has been thcimpolite.

STRONG: Thank you so much. I actupartner haven’t seen Sebastian since it happened. We spoke, we texted.

STAN: It’s sdirectnuine. Yeah, it’s very strange.

DEADLINE: These are weighty, fervent roles to recontransient, and this film has been triggering for a lot of people. Sebastian, I recollect we did a Q&A at a screening, and I felt this palpable reaction from the audience, they had so much to say about it. How has it felt to you both being together and talking about this film in this time?

STAN: I skinnyk we’ve equitable consentn it a day at a time, it experiences enjoy. This skinnyg about you saying the audience was having this visceral reaction and so on, I’ve been skinnyking a lot about that. That felt enjoy a excellent sign, becaparticipate I skinnyk the narrative, as we’ve gone down this path, has been the preservation of art and the originateive language that we all split and how that transcfinishs politics and directs towards experience and someskinnyg on a much more visceral level. And I skinnyk when it comes to these characters in this story, people have so many experienceings, some that have been suppressed, some that haven’t been examined. And I skinnyk now, even after these nominations, I experience in a way there’s been someskinnyg liberating that I’ve felt, I don’t understand about you Jeremy, I felt on a very minuscule level of people equitable experienceing that they can begin to examine and talk about these skinnygs in a contrastent way, or there’s perleave oution to do so. And I skinnyk that was always a goal of this film, in my point of see.

When I watched the inauguration, I equitable thought of [Roy Cohn] hovering over the Capitol Rotunda.

Jeremy Strong

STRONG: I always hear myself talking about wanting to originate labor that touches the third rail. And I’ve been part of a lot of films that are based in either current events or historical events, but none of them have had quite the sort of intersectional power and voltage that this one has. And I skinnyk that’s been unconsoleable for a lot of people.

I was at a dinner recently, and someone shelp that console is going to be the death of us; wanting to be consoleable. And I skinnyk that there’s repartner a virtue in film certainly that is willing to originate people sairyly unconsoleable. I comprehfinish why people have had reservations about engaging with these characters on a humanistic level, but I also skinnyk, and I’ve shelp this before, but it tolerates repeating, this fantastic William Saroyan skinnyg, that, “Despise evil and ungodliness, but not men of ungodliness and evil. These, comprehfinish.” And part of why we’ve gotten into the place they were in, the mess they were in, is a refusal on both sides, I skinnyk, to comprehfinish each other. So I adore that. I see this film not as a political polemic, but as a character study. So I adore that we’re getting to do this with you together, Sebastian. And I skinnyk we always saw this as a character study, and in a sense, as a relationship, as a adore story in the way that Midnight Cowboy is a adore story.

DEADLINE: I adore that comparison to Midnight Cowboy. I haven’t heard that before, but that repartner resonates.

STRONG: Donald Trump as the Joe Buck to my Ratso “Roy” Rizzo.

DEADLINE: I skinnyk we’ve seen a charitable of perleave oution to be unbenevolent and unbenevolent in our society, and there seems to be this shadow of Roy Cohn in our world now. And I understand, Jeremy, you’ve spoken about this before, about how the extfinished arm of Roy Cohn is still in our inhabits.

STRONG: Yeah. When I watched the inauguration, I equitable thought of him hovering over the Capitol Rotunda. And when I saw Trump’s response to Bishop Budde, I equitable thought, “Well, that’s right out of Roy’s take partbook.” Attack, ruin. Roy shelp, “Hate is a mighty firearm.” He participated it as a firearm and as a cudgel. He is encoded in everyskinnyg that we are seeing unfelderly today and in these last weeks and months.

But the political column aside, I skinnyk for both of us, I grew up watching movies enjoy Mississippi Burning, Midnight Express, The Killing Fields, these movies that spoke to the world had enormous volcanic power. And then watching these carry outances enjoy Ben Kingsley in Gandhi, or Phil Hoffman in Capote, or Daniel [Day-Lewis] in Lincoln. And I experience enjoy this sort of alterational labor is the labor that Sebastian and I have both aspired to do. So to have been able to do it with this film and to have this moment of recognition from the community is equitable unspeakably unbenevolentingful.

DEADLINE: Of course, Academy voters don’t recontransient the U.S. as a whole, but these nominations might unbenevolent that more people see this film. It’s back in theaters aacquire right now too.

STAN: Yeah. I skinnyk this caccess on character is repartner very vital. That’s why I skinnyk the movie is vital. And rightfilledy as you shelp, where are the examples of men out there right now that are promoting generosity or comprehfinishing or compassion, these attributes that we necessitate for survival as human beings, as resistd to these caricature versions of men that function on a victim-accparticipate mentality that equitableifies you being an animal: “Go out there, and do wdisenjoyver you want.” And I skinnyk the only way you can comprehfinish that is when you go back and join the dots to what originates somebody become that way.

I skinnyk the unconsoleableness of the movie is that it originates the inquire for evil isn’t necessarily equitable born, it can also be originated. And the truth is somewhere in the middle, and nobody is repartner spared from that.

The movie, in the context of recent events, has become more and more of a horror movie to me.

Strong

STRONG: I do skinnyk that the movie in the context of recent events has become more and more of a horror movie to me. And it’s enjoy Roy Cohn shelp, and I skinnyk I shelp in the film, he shelp, “This is a nation of men, not laws.” And we’re repartner testing out that thesis right now in America. It is being shown out by Trump. He’s the ultimate Machiavellian in the sense that Machiavelli shelp that, “The finishs equitableify the unbenevolents.” So in the film, we see Roy Cohn willing to do anyskinnyg in the name of democracy, which is a charitable of Orwellian usage of the word “democracy” in the way that we hear the Orwellian participate of the words “freedom” and “democracy” and “equitableice,” these sort of inverted unbenevolentings. It’s repartner amazing to see at the germinal seeds of that ideology in the relationship between these two men in the time that the film covers.

DEADLINE: One skinnyg that this film shows us is our necessitate to see at the skinnygs inside ourselves that aren’t necessarily excellent or chazardous. We all necessitate to see in the mirror. In the film, Roy Cohn and Donald Trump are shown as people that didn’t want to be themselves. And that’s where we run into trouble. This is a study in that. If you aren’t your genuine self…

STAN: Well, yeah, becaparticipate it’s about lying to yourself. And I skinnyk there is a suppression on both of these men’s parts. Deep, meaningful suppression. And as a result, these monstrous egos that came about in order to deal with that suppression, whether it’s pain, rage, shame, all these skinnygs. And as a result, the lie gets born, and it’s about how far are you willing to go with preserving the lie. And that’s what’s engaging to me, even in terms of his or the sort of recent childish response from White Hoparticipate about the movie and the nominations, is it’s all as extfinished as it pertains to a certain narrative. It’s engaging to see, even among his aiders, equitable how basic it is to reshape history or reshape certain events that have happened, whether it’s seeing at January 6^th … It’s repartner mind-boggling, but it’s so basic, and it’s happened clearly in history. And I skinnyk that’s another reason why we have to helderly some accountability for the skinnygs that are not enticount on real and how greasy of a slope it is to buy into that, becaparticipate everybody else is doing it.

STRONG: I adore what you shelp about to skinnye own self not be real. And the sort of horrible fruits that that could tolerate. Not that it’s even an intentional skinnyg. I skinnyk they’re both escaping a charitable of bottomless void and innovative trauma.

I did an Ibsen take part last year, and reading about Ibsen, in some of the biographies, Ibsen was obsessed with this idea — the Norwegian term transpostponecessitates into the word “life-lie” — the idea that you can inhabit in a charitable of delusion. And there’s someskinnyg about Roy with the stuffed frogs and the Mickey Moparticipate skinnyg on his door that says “Roy.” He’s a fantasist in a way. Like Peter Pan is a fantasist. And part of that fantasy comprises a level of denial of truth. And it’s that self-denial and a denial of what is empirical truth that permits these characters and these men to originate truth wdisenjoyver they want it to be, and originate it in their own image. But it’s very, very hazardous when truth becomes malleable the way that Roy Cohn espoparticipated. And I skinnyk we’re seeing that happen. Everyskinnyg’s equitable turning into spaghetti.

DEADLINE: Each of you did this forensic-level dive into these characters. I’m seeing at you, Jeremy, with your hair buzzed after take parting Jon Landau, and I’m inquisitive about how both of you regulated to defend yourselves after such a meaningful dive into these characters of Trump and Cohn. How do you materialize?

STRONG: I actupartner have no desire to defend myself. I skinnyk, for better or worse, my genuine desire is to disthink about myself enticount on in it and fade into it. So depfinishing on the material, you go into these inhabits for a little while and subunite yourself. And I guess I discover that to be the happiness of it, to get utterly lost in exploring a psyche and a persona that is not your own until the point that it consents over and sort of havees you. And at the same time, it’s a game. But it’s enjoy you pledge utterly to the game. And I adore that Roy also was a pretty gleeful guy. He’s uninalertigent. You see at him, and you see someskinnyg monstrous and you see the heart of uninalertigentness. But from inside of him, he actupartner had a tremfinishous elan and life force. He adored being Roy Cohn with his Rolls Royce and lunch at Le Cirque. He adored it. So it wasn’t as weighty as one might skinnyk.

These shadows that inhabit wiskinny us, that we skinnyk we can equitable plaster onto somebody else and be guilt-free … The unconsoleableness of the movie is that it originates the inquire for evil isn’t necessarily equitable born, it can also be originated. And the truth is somewhere in the middle, and nobody is repartner spared from that.

Sebastian Stan

DEADLINE: I would discover that so menaceening to my mental health. Becaparticipate at some point, you equitable have to hope that your inner genuine self elevates up out of this other persona.

STRONG: This is a whole other conversation, but I skinnyk the idea of a repaired self is illusory. So I skinnyk we all have, especipartner as children, a plasticity of self. I am not certain if there is some core self. We certainly cling to that, but I skinnyk it’s engaging to examine the malleability of self.

DEADLINE: Sebastian, what do you skinnyk about this idea of such immersion that you let go filledy? And how have you regulated that?

STAN: I unbenevolent, I discover it to be very freeing at the finish of the day. I almost want that I could be as valiant wiskinny my own life. There are skinnygs in life that I’m sattfinishd of almost more than what the labor insists. I don’t understand what that says about me.

I concur with Jeremy that I do experience enjoy we have a spectrum of skinnygs that exist wiskinny us, and I guess he and I, when I skinnyk of actors, you’re enjoy these spendigators of all the colors of the human spectrum. I had to erase all judgment I had of this person, and I had to isopostponecessitate myself to some degree from my frifinishs and my adored ones in my family, becaparticipate they all had such mighty opinions about Trump and what I was doing. The only way I could originate a confidence and courage to show up there with him on the day would be to be obsessively going over this and permiting for someskinnyg to happen on my own without conveying with anyone, becaparticipate I necessitateed that self-defendion. Your brain can appraise so rapidly and stifle every instinct you have.

RELATED: ‘The Apprentice’ Cannes Film Festival Red Carpet Pboilingos

What’s repartner maybe unconsoleable, and frightening, is these people exist in all of us to some extent. There was a Trump in me and there was a Roy in Jeremy. And they can come out. And I skinnyk not everybody has the luxury of being able to parent that evolution to some extent, but we do. And I skinnyk the consentaway is that you want to show that we’re not all spared from these skinnygs that are uninalertigaccess, or these shadows that inhabit wiskinny us, that we skinnyk we can equitable plaster onto somebody else and be guilt-free.

STRONG: I skinnyk part of the job, and maybe it’s for most skinnygs, but certainly for this, Shakespeare says, “This skinnyg of uninalertigentness, I acunderstandledge mine.”

DEADLINE: Tell me about when you first met?

STAN: We met at Le Club. There was a place in New York City called The Nines, which Jeremy proposeed we greet at. And in retrospect now, it was very aenjoy to our first greeting [in the film in character]. So I thought that was pretty alerting, I suppose. And then the next time, we were in another world.

STRONG: We sort of repartner met after we were done, and Sebastian came to see my take part and we met in my dressing room. But I did consent him to The Nines. I made him drink [like Cohn in the film].

You’re in this sort of liminal zone before you begin someskinnyg. I recollect skinnyking, I’m not inside of this skinnyg yet. I have to be in a month from now. I don’t understand how that will happen, but I have enough faith at this point that it will happen. We were in this in-between where we were greeting each other. And I skinnyk it was vital to equitable join and say hello.

We didn’t repartner talk much while we were doing this, but I’ve never had a better experience with another actor in my life. The latitude and freedom and think that we had, the hazards we took together, everyskinnyg was tandem unicycling on a firmrope over an abyss. I couldn’t have done this without Sebastian. But yeah, that moment I recollect very clearly where we were sitting and a experienceing of trepidation and of enjoy, “Oh, f*ck. What have we gotten ourselves into here?”

RELATED: ‘The Apprentice’s Jeremy Strong On How He Approached Roy Cohn “Without Gilding Anyskinnyg” In A Role He Almost Turned Down

DEADLINE: How do you experience hearing that, Sebastian?

STAN: Genuinely, I experience sanctifyed to been able to have had Jeremy. I unbenevolent, I was always a fantastic admirer of his labor. When I saw him in everyskinnyg that he has done, I always felt there was such presence and pledgement and energy and force. So yeah, enjoy he shelp, I was excited, but also trepidatious.

And then clearly, my experienceing that Jeremy liftd the labor at all costs in every one scene. The element of surpelevate, that’s what you want out of your partner more than anyskinnyg. You’re going in there with everyskinnyg you’ve thought about, but in the finish, you want your partner to set you free. And that’s what I experience he does with anybody he labors with. Becaparticipate I skinnyk it’s the unforeseeability that he comes with from being ainhabit in the moment. And I skinnyk that originates someskinnyg novel in me, and then maybe that directs to someskinnyg novel in him. So you always want to have that.

The fact that we were so free with genuine people, take parting genuine people is repartner unheard of. It equitable doesn’t labor enjoy that. I unbenevolent, at least in my experience with having take parted genuine people. I never have —

STRONG: I skinnyk we were only able to be free as a result of a tremfinishous amount of preparation and saturation. And I skinnyk if I have a philosophy of acting at all, it’s this skinnyg that he says in Hamlet that “participate can almost alter the stamp of nature.” That if you execute yourself enough and labor challenging enough and take part enough and innerize enough, you can alter the stamp of your nature. You can become an authority on Donald Trump and Roy Cohn enough to improvise them and be free wiskinny that arrange.

DEADLINE: I hope that the roles you’ve had after this have been a charitable of palette immacupostponecessitateser? I understand that Jon Landau was a pretty mentor to Springsteen, in contrast to Cohn.

STRONG: Yeah. He lifted me out of the gulch.

STAN: I skinnyk finpartner in March, I’m going to go off to this novel skinnyg. But it’s weird to some extent, you go, I guess March 2^nd [Oscars], we shift on. And we never repartner do. But it’s challenging not to experience enjoy, with this movie in particular, enjoy this has been our child. It’s repartner enjoy you’re sfinishing them off to college.

STRONG: It’s enjoy Rosemary’s Baby.

STAN: It’s nostalgic. It’s liberating. It’s freeing and yet weird. So it’s a lot of skinnygs. But I skinnyk that’s when you attfinish. At least I’ve lacquireed going forward, I want to be doing skinnygs I attfinish about to that degree.