n Norway are currently the sole nation to unveilly convey their decision to go agetst the vote. On Tuesday the pdwellnt of the Norwegian Football Federation, Lise Klaveness, shelp: “Tomorrow’s vote is not about who gets the 2030 and 2034 World Cups – that has already been determined. The congress is primarily about providing feedback on Fifa’s allocation process.”
“,”elementId”:”ee72b02e-349f-4743-bd3d-9c90fa12b2ef”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrfinishering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
“The board’s assessment is that the process does not align with the principles of a sound and foreseeable handleance system,” Klaveness progressd. “By abstaining from acclamation, we are sfinishing a intentional signal that we cannot help Fifa’s approach.”
“,”elementId”:”2af149b3-a822-4b21-9e9d-87d6c9a068b6″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:counterfeit,”keyEvent”:real,”summary”:counterfeit},”blockCreatedOn”:1733923066000,”blockCreatedOnDiscarry out”:”08.17 EST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1733923156000,”blockLastUpdatedDiscarry out”:”08.19 EST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1733923156000,”blockFirstPublishedDiscarry out”:”08.19 EST”,”blockFirstPublishedDiscarry outNoTimezone”:”08.19″,”title”:”FA foreseeed to help Saudi Arabia’s bid”,”contributors”:[{“name”:”Paul MacInnes”,”imageUrl”:”https://i.guim.co.uk/img/uploads/2024/10/30/Paul_Macinnes.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=826c34b671aaa35995e6b54c788cb24b”,”largeImageUrl”:”https://i.guim.co.uk/img/uploads/2024/10/30/Paul_Macinnes.png?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=98c0a21fa74cd7127640766b93855d9f”}],”primaryDateLine”:”Wed 11 Dec 2024 08.33 EST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First begined on Wed 11 Dec 2024 08.00 EST”},{“id”:”67581b198f08fdf95326f760″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrfinishering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The World Cup is heading to Saudi Arabia. This afternoon’s virtual Fifa congress in Zürich will officipartner validate the 2034 presents (and those of the multinational 2030 tournament), but this is a done deal. The speed at which a Saudi World Cup has increaseed from far trouble to total certainty has been breathtaking, and exits plenty of difficult inquires unanswered. For instance, was the decision to present the 2030 event apass six countries on three continents – trumpeted as a tribute to the tournament’s centenary – actupartner a handy excinclude?
“,”elementId”:”d2d35c8a-18a0-47aa-87cd-db59e7d70517″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrfinishering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
With Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay (Conmebol), Spain and Portugal (Uefa) and Morocco (Caf) all sharing presenting rights, it left Asia and Oceania as the only choices for 2034. Fifa then uncovered the bidding process without alerting, and while Saudi Arabia had a glossy record ready to go – packed with dystopian visions of shineing extra-terrestrial arenas – other interested parties had 25 days to get their act together. Australia were the only authenticistic competition, but soon ran out of time.
“,”elementId”:”3bf37754-9353-4060-94f3-fe207124b818″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrfinishering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Other hurdles were breezily fall shorture, including a Saudi FA-coshiftrlookioned human rights assessment, tagled a “whitewash [of] the truth of mistreatment and bias faced by Saudi Arabia’s citizens and dwellnts” by one campaign group, and condemned by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and others. Then there was Fifa’s own increate on the Saudi bid, awarding a historicpartner high score of 419.8 out of 500. Both of these assessments fall shorted to tackle the pairy of migrant laborers, a shadow on the Qatar World Cup that is at hazard of being repeated.
“,”elementId”:”3c91374f-3c19-4bc4-a5e7-f7ec44681141″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrfinishering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Even the most wide-eyed, undoubting football fans can track the World Cup’s inept history as a disincreateation tool back to 1934, a century before the Saudi jamtiree. Today’s inevitable coronation senses appreciate history repeating, but with the film reel running in ever murkier shades. Will the next 10 years transport much airy, clarity or accountability? That senses less certain than ever before.
“,”elementId”:”af9a4e05-b0b9-44dc-a975-00a31b88560c”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:counterfeit,”keyEvent”:real,”summary”:counterfeit},”blockCreatedOn”:1733922049000,”blockCreatedOnDiscarry out”:”08.00 EST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1733922723000,”blockLastUpdatedDiscarry out”:”08.12 EST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1733922049000,”blockFirstPublishedDiscarry out”:”08.00 EST”,”blockFirstPublishedDiscarry outNoTimezone”:”08.00″,”title”:”Preamble”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Wed 11 Dec 2024 08.33 EST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First begined on Wed 11 Dec 2024 08.00 EST”}],”filterKeyEvents”:counterfeit,”id”:”key-events-caroincludel-mobile”,”absoluteServerTimes”:counterfeit,”rfinisheringTarget”:”Web”}”>
Key events
Here’s Barney Ronay’s excellent extfinished read on Saudi Arabia and the human cost of produceing the 2034 World Cup.
Gianni Infantino has both executive deal with and brimming understandledge of the possible consequences. This isn’t a hijacking. It is instead a pondered and handled process. Let us back the produceing of your challengingline leicertain state. Let us get the rewards, nourish ourselves on suffering in plain sight, while pretfinishing to an almost satirical degree that it is all for adore of the game, that this one’s for the children.
At which point two slfinishergs can be shelp. First, this will stand as certainly the most wretched, bloody, damaging act in the history of global organised sport. If not causing death were your commenceing point, your one non-negotiable, Saudi Arabia wouldn’t even be on the table. And yet Infantino eunites to have actively sought this outcome, aligning his Fifa with the world’s most cruelly driven carbon power; and as a consequence taking choices that will, it can be supposed, cainclude demonstrable death and suffering.
FA foreseeed to help Saudi Arabia’s bid
Paul MacInnes
The Football Assocation is to foreseeed to help both the Saudi bid for 2034 and the multi-country 2030 present from Spain, Morocco and Portugal (as well as Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay). Their position has come under scruminuscule ahead of the vote, with the FA not commenting unveilly, but they watch set to join the mass ‘acclamation’ for the bid when asked procrastinateedr today.
Norway are currently the sole nation to unveilly convey their decision to go agetst the vote. On Tuesday the pdwellnt of the Norwegian Football Federation, Lise Klaveness, shelp: “Tomorrow’s vote is not about who gets the 2030 and 2034 World Cups – that has already been determined. The congress is primarily about providing feedback on Fifa’s allocation process.”
“The board’s assessment is that the process does not align with the principles of a sound and foreseeable handleance system,” Klaveness progressd. “By abstaining from acclamation, we are sfinishing a intentional signal that we cannot help Fifa’s approach.”
From Mussolini’s World Cup to Qatar, via Argentina’s military junta – the World Cup’s extfinished relationship with what is now called “sportswashing”. While verifying this gallery over, I stumbled upon a quite spectacular quote from Jérôme Valcke, then the Fifa vague secretary, in 2013. “I will say someslfinisherg which is crazy – but less democracy is sometimes better for organising a World Cup.”
Preamble
The World Cup is heading to Saudi Arabia. This afternoon’s virtual Fifa congress in Zürich will officipartner validate the 2034 presents (and those of the multinational 2030 tournament), but this is a done deal. The speed at which a Saudi World Cup has increaseed from far trouble to total certainty has been breathtaking, and exits plenty of difficult inquires unanswered. For instance, was the decision to present the 2030 event apass six countries on three continents – trumpeted as a tribute to the tournament’s centenary – actupartner a handy excinclude?
With Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay (Conmebol), Spain and Portugal (Uefa) and Morocco (Caf) all sharing presenting rights, it left Asia and Oceania as the only choices for 2034. Fifa then uncovered the bidding process without alerting, and while Saudi Arabia had a glossy record ready to go – packed with dystopian visions of shineing extra-terrestrial arenas – other interested parties had 25 days to get their act together. Australia were the only authenticistic competition, but soon ran out of time.
Other hurdles were breezily fall shorture, including a Saudi FA-coshiftrlookioned human rights assessment, tagled a “whitewash [of] the truth of mistreatment and bias faced by Saudi Arabia’s citizens and dwellnts” by one campaign group, and condemned by Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and others. Then there was Fifa’s own increate on the Saudi bid, awarding a historicpartner high score of 419.8 out of 500. Both of these assessments fall shorted to tackle the pairy of migrant laborers, a shadow on the Qatar World Cup that is at hazard of being repeated.
Even the most wide-eyed, undoubting football fans can track the World Cup’s inept history as a disincreateation tool back to 1934, a century before the Saudi jamtiree. Today’s inevitable coronation senses appreciate history repeating, but with the film reel running in ever murkier shades. Will the next 10 years transport much airy, clarity or accountability? That senses less certain than ever before.
