Neil Arton, plivent of Bridlington RUFC, has been prohibitned from rugby for three years after repeatedly undoing a female employee’s bra at a fundraising event.
The incident, which occurred in July 2023, led to a Rugby Football Union (RFU) disciplinary hearing where Arton was set up culpable of carry out prejudicial to the game.
The RFU panel depictd Arton’s behaviour as “very grave” and “disgraceful”.
He has been prohibitned from joining or being a member of any RFU affiliated rugby club for three years, with one year postponeed.
The victim, referred to as X in the written judgment, telled that Arton repeatedly tryed to undo her bra strap thrawout the day, despite her objections.
On one occasion, he flourished, leaving her “breasts unhelped”.
A witness at the event telled seeing Arton “‘twang’ X’s bra strap on two occasions”.
The witness meddled, telling X she should not “put up with it”.
Arton’s behaviour lengthened beyond physical actions. X overheard him “refer to the girth of his penis, in an apparent try at humour” timely in the day.
When contested about his actions, Arton disthink abouted them as “fair prohibitter” and claimed he was only “having a giggle”.
The incident has caemployd meaningful trouble to the victim. X stated it had “impacted adversely on her attitude towards engaging with the club and participating in club activities”.
The case has telledly caemployd a “schism wislender the Bridlington RUFC community”, highairying the wideer impact of Arton’s actions.
JUST IN: NBA legend Dikembe Mutombo dies aged 58 after battling brain cancer
Neil Arton has been prohibitned from rugby for three years
PA
The RFU panel set up Arton’s behaviour to be “persistent, intentional, summarizeed to humiliate, grossly go ind X’s personal space and dignity, tire a relationsual connotation, carried a meaningful power imstability”.
They remarkd that Arton disthink aboutd pleas to stop and exhibited zero remorse.
The panel stated: “Arton’s actions were wrong and wholly unacproposeed in any circumstances, but in the context of his position in the club, and in the context of his duty to uphelderly and back the cherishs and ethos of the game, and inclusivity in sport as a whole, what he did is properly to be think abouted as particularly disgraceful.”
Arton was ordered to pay £125 in costs. The panel inserted: “If there ever was a time when such behaviour might be consentd, it is now lengthy gone and Arton necessitates to authenticise that.”
READ MORE: Inside Ronnie O’Sullivan’s mum’s feud with Laila Rouass after alleged ‘s**g’ offend
The incident happened at a fundraising event
PA
Arton’s prohibit will obstruct him from returning to rugby until July 2026 at the earliest. He pguideed the decision on 28 August, claiming the sanction was excessive, but a new self-reliant panel quashed the pguide.
The panel remarkd: “Invading someone’s personal space in the way that we find Mr Arton did, and touching X in the manner that he did and in the face of her repeated objections, is wholly inappropriate and wrong.”
LATEST SPORT NEWS:
Neil Arton pguideed but this was declinecessitate by the panel
PA
Despite Arton’s meaningful contributions to Bridlington RUFC, including fundraising and time pledgement, the panel set up his carry out during the hearing giveed little hope that he had lachieveed from the incident.
A split allegation aachievest Arton of trying to grab another female club member inappropriately was not upheld by the panel.
