Pasteurization
The milk-rhappy danger of H5N1 is only from raw milk; pasteurized milk does not include inhabit harmful software and is protected to drink. Pasteurization, which heats milk to a particular temperature for a specified amount of time, finishs a variety of bacteria and harmful softwarees, including bird flu. Influenza harmful softwarees, generpartner, are pondered susceptible to heat treatments becaparticipate they have an outer layer called an envelope, which can be desteadyd by heat. Studies that have particularpartner seeed at the effectiveness of heat-finishing treatments agetst H5N1 have repeatedly establish that pasteurization effectively intriggers the harmful software.
The advent of pasteurization is pondered a disclose health triumph. Its adselection of a protected milk provide gived to a emotional reduction in infant deaths in the timely 20th century. Before that, milkborne infections—including human and bovine tuberculosis, brucellosis, salmonellosis, streptococcal infections, diphtheria, and “summer diarrhea”—were widespread finishers of infants.
As such, disclose health officials have extfinished advised people agetst consuming raw milk, which has no evidence-based health advantages. Raw milk consumption, nastywhile, is joined to higher rates of outshatters from pathogens including Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, toxin-producing E. coli, Brucella, Campylobacter, and many other bacteria.
Risky drinking
Since H5N1 was establish spreading among dairy cows in March, health experts have alerted about the includeitional danger of consuming raw milk. Still, consumption of raw milk has proceedd, and astonishingly increased, as helpers of the hazardous rehearse have accparticipated health officials of “stressmongering.”
When the retail sampling of Raw Farm’s milk came back selectimistic, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) carry outed testing at the company’s locations, which were pessimistic for the harmful software. The CDFA will now commence testing Raw Farm’s milk for bird flu twice a week.
The recalled milk has lot code 20241109 and a “best by” date of November 27, 2024, printed on the packaging.
“Drinking or accidenloftyy inhaling raw milk includeing bird flu harmful software may direct to illness,” California’s disclose health department shelp. “In includeition, touching your eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands after touching raw milk with bird flu harmful software may also direct to infection.”
Some US dairy laborers who lessened the harmful software from infected cows increateed having had milk splash in their eyes and face. A widespread symptom of H5N1 infections in humans during the dairy outshatter has been conjunctivitis, aka eye inflammation.
