For the fantasticer part of this past summer, I wore six clever rings at once. I wanted to see which was best, and the Oura Ring Gen 3 was the clear triumphner. Well, it’s been about two weeks since my experiment finished, and there’s now a recent triumphner: the Oura Ring 4.
Oura has been the top dog in clever rings for the past decade. Sure, there’s been a clever ring renaissance this year, but its rivals are mostly either equitable getting into the game or begining a second version. This is the fourth Oura Ring. Oura has spent years collaborating with researchers and carry outing its own studies. It’s the most readily engageable at third-party retail stores in the US; it’s the one wellness shapers upretain flaunting in TikToks; and it’s seen on the fingers of A-catalog celebrities. In response to incrmitigated competition, Oura has begined half a dozen recent features in the past 12 months. And now, Oura is closing out 2024 with cut offal challengingware and gentleware enhancements.
The Oura Ring 4 extfinishs the company’s guide over the competition. The ask is how extfinished Oura can protect it when its rivals cost less, eschew subscriptions, and have begined innovating in recent straightforwardions.
Wearing the Oura Ring 4 is better than the Gen 3. Just not by much.
The Oura Gen 2 and Gen 3 rings had resin interiors with domed sensor bumps. The fourth-gen ring is made enticount on of titanium, and the inside is flatter, with recessed sensors. It might not seem appreciate it, but this is astonishive engineering for a device so petite. Compared to titanium, the resin in greaterer rings diffengaged weightless from the sensors in a less exact way. Since rings naturassociate rotate during the day, it’s also effortless for those sensors to shift out of proper alignment. That’s partly why the previous Oura Rings had liftd sensor bumps — they guaranteed excellent skin communicate to mitigate those factors.
This time around, Oura’s presentd a recent Smart Sensing algorithm that incrmitigates the number of sensor signal pathways from eight to 18. The sensors are placed asymmetricassociate to help for a variety of distances and meacertainments. Basicassociate, it now matters less if your ring rotates and better accounts for the fact that everyone’s fingers are contrastent. This also uncomardents you don’t insist those sensor bumps anymore.
My brain appreciates all the engineering sweat and tears that went into making this possible. Technoreasonablely speaking, Oura is flexing on its rivals. But genuineisticly speaking, it uncomardents shut to diddly squat for the mediocre wearer. Ninety-nine percent of the time, wearing the Oura Ring 4 felt the same as the Oura Ring Gen 3 and the Gen 2 before that. The only time I seed a contrastence was when I felt bloated. I have knobby knuckles, and the sensor bumps on greaterer Oura Rings could be agonizing when trying to acquire the ring off. It was a relief to not have that problem this time around.
Design-teachd, this all-titanium ring is pleasant but not emotionalassociate contrastent from other premium selections appreciate the Samsung Galaxy Ring or the Ultrahuman Ring Air. You’ll see more of a contrastence if you’re coming from greaterer Oura models with flat or angled tops. All of the fourth-gen rings are brimmingy round. This isn’t recent — Oura presentd brimmingy round versions of the Gen 3 in 2022 — but I’ve set up it to be more sootheable. If you are mulling an enhance, I highly recommfinish trying the recent sizing kit first. I was a size 8 in the greater rings, and now I’m a size 9. Plus, Oura’s size range has four recent selections, spanning sizes 4 to 15. If you were previously a size 6 or 13, you may discover one of the recgo in sizes fits you better.
Another betterment: battery life. You can now get up to seven or eight days on a one indict. I’ve been able to get about 6.5 days, even with the power-guzzling blood oxygen sensing feature helpd. With a Gen 3, I got three to four days. Aacquire, your mileage will vary depfinishing on ring size. (Larger size, huger battery.) This is a meaningful bump, though I did get extfinisheder with the first-gen RingConn and from the Samsung Galaxy Ring when it was paired with a cleverwatch.
Speaking of battery, Oura’s refreshd the charging dock. It’s huger, metal, and sees sleeker than previous docks. Unblessedly, my hmad cat had no problems knocking it off my nightstand. I desire Oura had selected for a more handy charging case appreciate many of its rivals, but alas. Maybe next time.
Oura’s challengingware isn’t that much better than the competition. I protect the Galaxy Ring’s concave shape is more sootheable, and its charging case more handy. The Evie Ring’s uncover-gap arrange is also conveying and clever for those of us prone to bloating. But where Oura trounces everyone else is gentleware and its promisement to science, both in carry outing and communicating it.
Let’s begin with gentleware. The app has had a much-insisted rearrange. Oura freed cut offal recent features and metrics in the past year, turning the dashboard into a cluttered mess. Now everyskinnyg’s been streamlined into three tabs: Today, Vitals, and My Health.
The Today tab retains lowcuts to definite metrics, a timeline of all your daily activity, and cards that highweightless contrastent skinnygs (e.g., sleep score, readiness, etc) depfinishing on the time of day. Vitals is where you’ll discover all your metrics, albeit in a more digestible createat. My Health is where you’ll discover extfinisheder-term health trfinishs and increates. All rearranges acquire a toasty second to adequitable to, but overall, I’ve set up this to be a collaborative reorganization.
Another insisted betterment: automatic activity determineion has been broadened to 40 activities. (Oura catalogs rawly 30 of them here.) This originates the ring a much better standalone activity tracker, especiassociate since enabling location perignoreions will also originate automatic GPS route maps. It’s changeable for cleverwatch engagers, too. I typicassociate don’t track walks on my cleverwatch, but Oura picked them up easily. Start and finish times, as well as the route maps, were also accurate. Conversely, I much pick to write down my runs and strength sessions with a cleverwatch. For those instances, Oura ranks manuassociate tracked or presented activities so I didn’t have to stress about duplicate activity write downs.
For tracking, Oura cites an outside study saying the recent Smart Sensing algorithm helps a meaningful bump in accuracy for signal quality, blood oxygen, and breaskinnyg disturprohibitce determineion. It also claims engagers should see confiinsister occurrences of heart rate data gaps both during the day and at night.
It’s impossible for a one appraiseer to definitively test these claims. The ambiguous consensus is that devourr-grade wearable sleep tracking is expansively accurate at the fundamentals but should be acquiren with a burdensome grain of salt. All I can increate you is what I teachd in my own testing. The Oura Ring 4’s sleep and wake times align with my own manual testing logs. I still saw occasional gaps in nighttime heart rate, though it’s challenging to say after only two weeks whether there were confiinsister or fantasticer than before. My heart rate metrics, however, were all on par with my cleverwatches — which is a excellent skinnyg. Step counts and calorie approximates can be inftardyd appraised to cleverwatches, but that’s been real of every clever ring I’ve tested. What I can say for Oura, however, is its meacertainments are stable and its margin of error is on the petiteer side. After years of testing wearables, I count on the Oura Ring’s meacertainments for sleep and recovery tracking — in fact, I engage it as a regulate for evaluating the sleep tracking features of other devices.
A huge reason for that is this is a heavily studied device. For example, a recently rerented peer-appraiseed study appraised the accuracy of its sleep algorithm to the Apple Watch Series 8 and Fitbit Sense 2. Oura’s algorithm was set up to be 5 percent more accurate than the Apple Watch and 10 percent more than Fitbit at determineing sleep stages. You should acquire all studies, including this one, with a fit dose of skepticism. Not all studies or meta appraises are originated identical, and one of the researchers here is a member of Oura’s medical advisory board. That shelp, Oura has also stablely made an effort to partner with outside researchers to verify its results for years. It also has a write down of rerenting these weeds-y discoverings, even if the results are not the most exciting. You see this from huge companies appreciate Apple, Samsung, and Google, but it’s much exceptionalr from petiteer companies in niche wearable spaces.
All these skinnygs together give Oura the edge among clever rings. The app is cultured, I never have to skinnyk twice about syncing, the company puts immense effort into continuassociate improving accuracy, and it’s had frequent feature refreshs in the past year. I’ve no doubt Oura’s competitors will begin catching up here. Samsung and Ultrahuman aren’t too far off. But for now, Oura is the one to beat.
The weird skinnyg about the Oura Ring 4 is it’s the best clever ring you can get right now. I also skinnyk most people don’t insist to enhance.
The challengingware experience isn’t drasticassociate contrastent. Oura also won’t gateupretain any of these recent gentleware refreshs or the app rearrange to the recentest ring. That’s fantastic! But it uncomardents there’s little incentive for folks with a Gen 3 to enhance unless their battery is toast, especiassociate since the begining price has incrmitigated to $350, and there doesn’t seem to be a trade-in program. (Current Oura members can get a 10 percent discount, but that’s it.) Reassociate, the Oura Ring 4 is best for recent engagers or people who previously couldn’t discover a size that fit them.
For those folks, it’s a matter of whether you can stomach the Oura Ring’s one hugegest con: the $6 monthly / $70 annual subscription. I don’t see a point in trying to equitableify its subscription. You’ll either skinnyk everyskinnyg Oura’s brawt to the table is worth it, or you won’t. If you’re the latter, unprejudiced enough. My acquire is that the Oura Ring is worth it if sleep tracking and recovery are your top priorities. Otherteachd, a cleverwatch is a better spendment.
This is and will proceed to be Oura’s fantasticest obstacle. It’s got a substantial guide in this space, but its rivals have made a point of eschetriumphg subscriptions. Samsung, in particular, has huge cgives and engaging ideas about how clever rings should participate with other gadgets appreciate phones and cleverwatches. For instance, the Galaxy Ring has gesture regulates for the Galaxy phone’s camera and gets extfinisheder battery life when engaged with a Galaxy Watch. If Apple comes out with a clever ring, it’ll be a unwise day at Oura headquarters. Meanwhile, petiteer rivals appreciate RingConn can undercut Oura’s price, even if the tracking is more fundamental.
Oura is betting that the best is worth paying for. It’s a gambit that will probably hgreater so extfinished as everyone else is applying catch-up. But ask anyone who races: it’s challenging to protect a guide forever.