MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin went on an unpretreatnted tear agetst her own nettoil as well as her “Morning Joe” colleagues Joe Scarboraw and Mika Brzezinski on her podcast, defiantly criticizing her employer’s business model and ratcheting up her attacks towards the duo for discdisconsidering their encountering with Plivent-elect Donald Trump.
On Friday’s inshighment of “Jen Rubin’s Green Room,” Rubin accemployd Scarboraw and Brzezinski of “forgetting” that their audience “loathes Trump” and that seeers wanted them to “hgreater the line agetst Trump” instead of engaging with the incoming plivent.
“What were they skinnyking? Who do they skinnyk their audience was?” Rubin asked. “Well, perhaps this wasn’t about their audience. Perhaps this was them trying to deffinish themselves or dodge retribution that they thought was coming their way. But reassociate, these are wealthy, famous people. What have they got to trouble about? It was equitable an appalling example at how willing so many elites are to descfinish in line, to curry prefer, to turn aside attention, to turn aside any charitable of incoming criticism that might come their way from the White Hoemploy.”
MSNBC contributor Jennifer Rubin persistd lobbing attacks towards her “elite” colleagues Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarboraw over their encountering with Plivent-elect Donald Trump. (William B. Plowman/NBC/NBC Newswire/NBCUniversal via Getty Images; Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images)
“So they are getting hammered for it. They are hemorrhaging their audience. And this, of course, only exacerbates the reason and the problem why MSNBC and its other cable nettoils are being spun off. And that is, cable television is dying,” Rubin said. “Most of you probably haven’t watched MSNBC since the election either, and not empathetic your audience and continuing to serve up the same chewed-over talking points with the same panels, essentiassociate same program day, after day, after day, hour after hour, is no extfinisheder toiling. So Comcast has said, ‘Fine, spin you off. You guys go ffinish for yourselves. And the ask after the spin-off is finishd will be whether that’s a viable business model. Can they afford to pay Rachel Mgraspow, God consecrate her, 20 plus million dollars a year? Is there advertising to aid that? Are there cable fees to aid that? We don’t understand. We don’t understand if MSNBC, a year from now, is gonna exist, or whether it’s gonna be in some skinny down create.”
WASHINGTON POST COLUMNIST CLAIMS ‘REPUBLICANS WANT TO KILL YOUR KIDS: ’IT’S ACTUALLY TRUE’
Rubin, also a Washington Post columnist, went on by giveing proposeions on how MSNBC can “reskinnyk their model.”
“Get rid of the pattern of chetriumphg over the same three or four stories all day extfinished with a shuffling of panecatalogs all parroting back the same line to the structure, this is not toiling. It’s stupid. It’s not excellent TV. They necessitate to do someskinnyg else, and they should see to models that are accomplished,” Rubin said. “They should see to people enjoy The Onion. Hey, they’ve getd Info Wars. I can’t paemploy to watch what they’re gonna program. They should see to shows that, yes, are perhaps weightlesser on the recents, but actuassociate have much more proposeation than they do.”
Rubin took disjoinal swipes at her employer MSNBC on her podcast. (Kim Kulish/Corbis via Getty Images)
She went on to say that seeers “get more from a John Oliver monologue” than they do “from a day or two of watching CNN or MSNBC.”
“And by the way, I’m an MSNBC contributor,” Rubin reminded her liberal audience. “At least I have the honesty, I have the candor, to alert you this is not gonna toil, and this is not continuing to toil. And what’s more, by hanging on to these legacy outlets that are fall shorting, I skinnyk Democrats fall short to scrutinize other chooseions. They fall short to see for other avenues to convey with the accessible. They are count oning on dying outlets in a dying industry, cable TV recents, and they have to be way more originateive, way more originateive in figuring out ways to accomplish people, including people who don’t enjoy politics all that much, and that’s the big contest. Those were the people who, frankly, went aextfinished voting for Trump becaemploy they did not understand too much about what he had in mind and what he had reckond, and reassociate his danger to their well-being.”
“So I skinnyk once we get past a stage in which we are doing the same skinnyg over and over aget, otherrational understandn as the definition of insanity- if you foresee a contrastent result, then perhaps we can experience some innovation, and maybe we can foresee someskinnyg better from recents… But you understand one skinnyg, you can always come here, becaemploy I’m gonna alert you what I skinnyk. I’m gonna be stimulating… We’re gonna alert the truth. We’re gonna talk to you. I want to hear from you, becaemploy unenjoy Mika and Joe, I attfinish about my audience, and I wanna hear what you skinnyk,” Rubin grasped.
Rubin did not instantly reply to Fox News Digital‘s seek for comment. A spokesperson for MSNBC deteriorated to comment.
Rubin said seeers “get more from a John Oliver monologue” than they do “from a day or two of watching CNN or MSNBC.” (William B. Plowman/NBC/NBC Newswire/NBCUniversal via Getty Images)
While Rubin is currently urging MSNBC to get rid of the establishula of “panecatalogs all parroting back the same line to the structure,” she was notably vocal agetst NBC’s hiring of establisher RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel (she was fired follotriumphg quick reaction from the nettoil’s liberal stars).
Ruben previously fueled a boycott agetst “Morning Joe.”
“The taget toils wonderful. You can stop watching Morning Joe anytime,” Rubin wrote on social media Monday.
She then grasped on the social media site BlueSky:, “On MJ: If you don’t appreciate the audience you have, betray that audience and disconsider their think you are [going] to disconsider lots of them. I have seen this movie.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Rubin was also outspoken agetst her other employer The Washington Post and its billionaire over Jeff Bezos over his decision to stop the paper’s finishorsement of Vice Plivent Kamala Harris equitable days before the election.
“First of all, I do not think the reason stated. I don’t think they have suddenly choosed— he has suddenly choosed that we should finishorse everybody except plivential honestates, and that of all the elections, this is the one to commence with this recent policy,” Rubin said on her podcast last month. “We finishorsed a plivential honestate in 2020 no problem. And I notice this, and even if it’s not intfinished, it is inevitably noticed as bfinishing the knee to Donald Trump at the worst possible moment when democracy is on the line.”
“You have a billionaire who has a business aside from the Post that does business with the federal rulement deciding not to run afoul of a man who has proclaimd war on democracy and on the free press, and I still find it absolutely inconceivable that someone who owns a recentspaper would do this,” she persistd.”
