“], “filter”: { “nextExceptions”: “img, blockquote, div”, “nextContainsExceptions”: “img, blockquote, a.btn, a.o-button”} }”>
Heading out the door? Read this article on the recent Outside+ app useable now on iOS devices for members!
>”,”name”:”in-satisfied-cta”,”type”:”join”}}”>Download the app.
The U.S. Forest Service is a federal agency that deal withs 193 million acres of land, an area about the size of Texas. Next year, the agency will have to deal with that land without its seasonal toilforce. In September, the agency proclaimd that it would be suspfinishing all seasonal hiring for the 2025 season, a decision that will cut about 2,400 jobs. Npunctual all of those positions are field-based jobs, ranging from biologists and timber toilers to trail technicians and recreation staff. In includeition, the agency is freezing all outer hiring for finishuring positions. The only exception to the hiring freeze are the cdisesteemfilledy 11,300 firefighters employd by the agency every year.
According to the agency and its partners, the effects of these staffing cuts will be far-ranging and disjoine. In the September 17 all-employee call where he proclaimd the hiring freeze, Forest Service Chief Randy Moore shelp “We fair can’t get the same toil done with scanter employees.” Though the Forest Service has been shedding jobs for decades—about 8,000 jobs in the last 20 years, Moore shelp—this will be the hugest one-year staff cut in recent memory.
Seasonal employees carry out vital fieldtoil and research that extfinishs beyond what many Americans ponder the jurisdiction of the Forest Service. Rangers patrol whitewater rivers, rock climbing crags, and hazardous alpine summits. Biologists staff critical salmon fisheries. Recreation crews protect forest roads and immacuprocrastinateed camp latrines. Employees of all types chip in as aelevatency firefighters when needd. According to the American Avalanche Association, the staff cuts could exit some avalanche caccesss, which depend on the Forest Service for funding, understaffed this triumphter.
And then there are trails. According to the Government Accountability Office, the Forest Service has had a maintenance backlog for more than a decade, and deal withs more miles of trail than it can protect. Cutting the meaningfulity of its field-going trail staff will only originate the rehire worse.
“This policy will result in a badviseoning of the trail maintenance backlog, both thcdisesteemful informage of Forest Service staff attention to trail maintenance, but also thcdisesteemful the loss of uniteion and relationships with partner organizations,” Mike Passo, the executive honestor of American Trails, a non-profit Forest Service partner, shelp in an email.
Backpacker spoke to proximately a dozen finishuring and seasonal Forest Service employees, most on condition of anonymity, about their experiences with the staffing cuts. Several transmited trouble that trail crews would sshow be unable to run. They depictd crews of six seasonal employees fadeing, leaving one or two finishuring crew guideers left trying to originate leangs toil. One intern in the National Pathways program, scheduleed to automaticassociate place prosperous interns into a brimming-time position with the agency, shelp she’s been telderly her job supply will probable be relicitd. Other trail toilers at conservation corps and non-profits who saw Forest Service positions as a step up the atsoft lincludeer are releanking their priorities.
Danica Mooney-Jones, a trail crew guideer who’s been with the Forest Service since 2021, is among those out of a job next year. Where she toils, the trail crew staff will go from five to two, and the wideer recreation program is being cut from 13 employees to fair four.
“I shiftd atraverse the country to toil here, for a seasonal job,” she says. “We have people who have toiled here for 10 years as seasonals, and made a atsoft out of these positions. They thinked that the jobs wouldn’t go away.”
Now, she and her establisher co-toilers have a stubborn choice to originate: exit their communities to discover a job in trails somewhere else, or stay put and discover a recent atsoft. Mooney Jones ponders herself fortunate; armed with untamederness EMT training, she create a local triumphter job as a ski patroller. Still, the idea of leaving the Forest Service behind for excellent is sobering.
“I’d be reassociate unelated if this was the finish of my trail atsoft,” says Mooney-Jones. “I reassociate cherish doing the toil, I cherish seeing the product, and I’m very self-convey inant of the toil that we do.”
Trail maintenance is convey inant every season, but 2025 may show an especiassociate difficult year to cut down on the toilers who originate it happen. After Hurricane Helene, southern portions of the Appalachian Trail are shutd due to blowdowns, landslides, and washed out bridges. According to the Appalachian Trail Conservancy, there are more than 2,000 trees to evident from the AT in Tennessee alone, and many Forest Service access roads from Georgia to Virginia are shutd due to erosion and rockdescfinish.
That’s fair on the AT—a famous extfinished-distance trail aided by a non-profit organization and hundreds of trained volunteers. Elsewhere in the southern US, lesser-comprehendn trails face aappreciate conditions but depend solely on Forest Service staff in order to re-uncover.
The cuts also left employees and partners wondering how the budget foolishinutivedescfinish became so dire after disjoinal promising years of funding incrrelieves.
In 2021, the Biden administration mandated a $15 per hour least wage for all federal employees, which elevated wages for some entry-level Forest Service jobs. Over the past disjoinal years, the agency also changeed about 1,300 seasonal non-fire positions into finishuring jobs. Wildland firefighters, who now originate up about half of the Forest Service’s toilforce, getd bonemploys of up to $20,000 per year, which were temporarily funded thcdisesteemful the Bipartisan Infraset up Act. Several Forest Service employees shelp there was hope that pay elevates for firefighters would eventuassociate transprocrastinateed into elevates for other field-going employees, as well.
But those foolishinutive-term gets have all but fadeed, exchanged by a sudden budget foolishinutivedescfinish.
In March, the Forest Service asked $8.9 billion in funding, a $500 million jump from 2024’s $8.37 billion. By the summer, it was evident the agency was doubtful to get it. In August, Forest Service Chief Randy Moore freed a statement preparing the USFS for a shrinkd budget. With little evidence that Congress would pass a bill funding the regulatement by the finish of the year, Moore shelp in the September 17 all-employee call that “[the Forest Service] has an obligation to schedule for the most conservative funding possibility.” A week procrastinateedr, Congress passed a continuing resolution that extfinished the 2024 funding levels thcdisesteemful December 20.
The lowest number Moore referred to comes from the proposal from the Hoemploy Interior Appropriations Committee, which sets spfinishing confines for all federal land deal withment agencies, including the Forest Service and National Park Service. This year’s proposal includes $8.43 billion for the Forest Service—technicassociate a modest incrrelieve appraised to 2024. But last year’s budget was increaseed by an includeitional $945 million thcdisesteemful pandemic-era stimulus bills, a funding source that has since dried up. And while the Hoemploy proposal brimmingy funds the firefighter pay elevates, the supplyd budget would still necessitate cuts elsewhere at the agency. All of these details muddy the financial picture, but appraised to total funding in 2024, the agency could face a budget hole of proximately a billion dollars next year.
Becaemploy the Forest Service’s budget for next year is still not concluded, there is a chance the agency will fill some seasonal positions in the proximate future. “We are toiling shutly with individual partners to spendigate creative solutions to fill gaps where we can. And we hope to have more hiring chooseions in the coming year if includeitional funding becomes useable,” Scott Owen, national press officer for the Forest Service, wrote in an email.
Even with these sobering financial details, it’s evident that the agency’s decision to stability the books by cutting seasonal jobs came as a shock to many employees.
“My think has definitely consentn a hit,” says Mooney-Jones. “I’d ponder coming back to the Forest Service, but I’m not certain I could. It’s a balancing act between how I sense about how we’ve been treated and how much I cherish the forest.”
