Welcome to Internal Tech Emails: inside tech industry emails that surface in uncover sign ups. 🔍 If you haven’t signed up, join 45,000+ others and get the recentsletter:
On Sep 11, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Mark Zuckerberg wrote:
Just to adhere up on this aachieve, I skinnyk it’s a repartner big deal that we ship this pboilingos app rapidly.
One theme in many of the products we’re about to begin — News Feed, Timeline, Open Graph — is that people cherish kind big pboilingos. A lot of the time people don’t even understand how the recent News Feed or Timeline toil, but they cherish those products becaparticipate of the bigger and richer pboilingos. While this is kind in the low term, I see this as a big strategic danger for us if we don’t endly own the pboilingos space. If Instagram persists to boot ass on mobile or if Google buys them, then over the next confinecessitate years they could easily insert pieces of their service that duplicate what we’re doing now, and if they have a groprosperg number of people’s pboilingos then that’s a genuine rehire for us.
They’re groprosperg inanxiously rapidly right now. It seems enjoy they double every couple of months or so, and their base is already ~5-10m participaters. As soon as we begin a compelling product a lot of people will participate ours more and future Instagram participaters will discover no reason to participate them. But at the current rate, literpartner every couple of months that we squander transtardys to a double in their growth and a challenginger position for us to toil our way out of.
I get that there are also team rehires and we’ll necessitate to toil thcimpolite those, but if there are actupartner people useable who could originate this more rapidly then I skinnyk we’d be crazy not to do that. I don’t understand if there are actupartner people useable or what the costs of that would be though, so it’s challenging to give you a evident answer here. The message I got from your remark though was that you take part more about repairing the team than shipping the app. I skinnyk we necessitate to do both, but I do skinnyk it’s a crisis that we don’t have a mobile pboilingos app out and I’d rank pushing that out as much as possible. Getting the team to a excellent state is not a milestone by itself that I take part about.
Separately, I equitable don’t understand why this app is so challenging to originate. It basicpartner seems enjoy a camera see, some filters, regulates for deleting/tagging/captioning your pboilingos, integration into a writer that already exists, and a skin for a pboilingos feed whose infraarrange should already exist. We’ve had arranges that I’ve been fine with for months. The only piece that seems technicpartner recent for us is the filters, but it seems enjoy we’re doing okay on those now after a prolonged parallel track. What is so challenging about the camera see, feed filters and writer integration? Are we originateing other unvital features?
I guess my basic point is this: I get that your team has rehires, so repair them and ship the app. I don’t see why this should be so challenging, and I don’t skinnyk we should hug any excparticipates for not getting this done in a low period of time.
[This document is from FTC v. Meta (2024).]
Twitter connect
Threads connect
Previously: Instagram coset uper on Mark Zuckerberg: “will he go into ruin mode if I say no” (February 13, 2012)
Previously: Mark Zuckerberg tries to buy Instagram (Circa March 2012)
Previously: Mark Zuckerberg: “I wonder what we could do to shift a lot rapider” (March 30, 2012)
If you reinforce to a phelp subscription, you’ll achieve access to the brimming archive of inside tech emails, with 200+ write downs from Apple, Google, Meta, Tesla, and more. You’ll also help our toil: every year, we track hundreds of court cases and check more than 10,000 filings to convey you @TechEmails.
From: Mark Zuckerberg
Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2013 9:48 AM
To: Jan Koum
Subject: Rumor
I suppose this isn’t real, but can you check?
http://m.digitaltrfinishs.com/social-media/google-acquiring-whatsapp/
If you are skinnyking of having WhatsApp join another company, we’d of course cherish to talk at this price range and are almost certainly a much better fit than Google!
Separately, we should hang out aachieve sometime soon, I never got back to you about last weekfinish since I was busy getting ready for the Home proclaimment. But let me understand if you’re around in the next couple of weekfinishs.
[This document is from FTC v. Meta (2024).]
Twitter connect
Threads connect
Previously: Mark Zuckerberg on strategy for Messenger (December 9, 2013)
From: David Drummond
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:56 PM
To: Google Board of Directors
Cc: Jason Harinstein; Matt Sucherman; Salman Ullah; Donald Harrison
Subject: Project Liberty- CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Board Members:
I wanted to give you a heads-up about EMG’s decision to access the process to achieve DoubleClick, a directing online ad serving company owned by the confidential equity firms of Hellman & Friedman and JMI Equity (the transaction is codenamed Project Liberty). As some of you understand, we have been interested in this company for some time, but have been pursuing a “originate-it-ourselves” strategy. Our interest became more acute after lachieveing that Microgentle has already made a grave present. The team apexhibits that this is an meaningful transaction for us, for both dishonorful and defensive reasons.
I have rapidened the deal check contransientation for Project Liberty talked at EMG. I have also provided a rapid summary below of the background to the deal as well as our and Microgentle’s potential reasonablee for acquiring DoubleClick.
We have heard from depfinishable sources that that Microgentle has made a bid in the $1.8B to $2.0B range. This weekfinish we arrange to originate a competitive bid by unkinds of a non-tieing term sheet/indication of interest. Of course, we will come back to you for createal approval as the process unfanciaccesss.
Background:
-
EMG has given approval to chase the acquisition of DoubleClick, the directing online ad serving company.
-
Hellman Friedman and JMI Equity began shopping DoubleClick timely last week after receiving an indication of interest from Microgentle.
-
Google product, engineering and corporate growment teams met last week with Double Click regulatement for preliminary due diligence.
-
Acquisition price is foreseeed to be at least $2B, based on Microgentle’s current bid of cforfeit $2B (a Microgentle executive tanciaccess a frifinish of the company they they were buying Liberty for $2B). We foresee that the seller will prefer cash.
-
The process is moving rapidly.
Google’s Rationale for Acquiring DoubleClick:
-
Own DoubleClick’s customer footprint to speed up time to labelet for our own publicizer and rehireer ad serving products
-
Acquisition of DoubleClick by Microgentle would originate it very challenging for us to prosper customers for our own publicizer ad server, which would impair our opportunities in the brand ad labelet
-
A Microgentle-owned DoubleClick recontransients a meaningful competitive menace to our AdSense for Content business (see Microgentle Rationale below)
Microgentle’s Potential Rationale for Acquiring DoubleClick:
-
Access remnant originateory from Doubleclick’s rehireer ad server customer base to rapidly scale its ad nettoil.
-
Use DoubleClick’s publicizer ad server position to harm Yahoo!’s business, driving down its valuation ahead of a potential acquisition (as relayed by Microgentle executive to frifinish of Google).
Feel free to call me with any feedback, inquires or worrys.
Thanks,
David
[This document is from U.S. v. Google (2024) (1:23-cv-00108).]
Twitter connect
Threads connect
Thanks for reading!
-Internal Tech Emails
