Karla Sofia Gascon has recently reacted to a resurfaced tweet that materializeed to show her criticizing her Emilia Perez co-star Selena Gomez. The Oscar-nominated actress firmly denied making the relabel, which referred to Gomez as a “wealthy rat,” calling the post a manipulation. In a recent intersee, Gascon insisted she has never spoken adversely about Gomez.
Here’s everyslimg you necessitate to understand about what Gascon said.
Karla Sofia Gascon reacts to Selena Gomez resurfaced tweet
Karla Sofia Gascon has pushed g back aobtainst a viral tweet in which she allegedly condemnd her Emilia Perez co-star Selena Gomez. The Spanish actress, who recently made history as an Oscar nominee, insists the viral tweet is phony and denies ever making such a statement. In an intersee with CNN en Español, Gascon stated, “Of course that’s not mine. I have never said anyslimg about my partner. I would never refer to her that way.”
The dispute erupted after elderly social media posts connected to Gascon resurfaced, igniteing expansivespread response. Among them was a post that materializeed to condemn Gomez, calling her a “wealthy rat.” Gascon allegedly wrote about Gomez, “She’s a wealthy rat who take parts the necessitatey bastard whenever she can and will never stop annoying her ex-boyfrifinish (Justin Bieber) and his wife.” (via Variety)
As the post obtained traction, cut offal media outlets covered the allegations. However, Gascon insists the tweet was not hers and says she is being unfairly focengaged.
In response to the growing criticism, Gascon took to Instagram, posting a lengthy statement about the dispute. She claimed her words were twisted, getn out of context, or enticount on manufactured. Gascon stated that her past relabels do not depict her and stressd her pledgement to personal growth. The actress also wrote, “Anyone who understands me understands that I am not a discriminatory.”
Despite her denial, the response has persistd, with some deffinishing Gascon aobtainst what they see as an online smear campaign. Meanwhile, others argue she should be held accountable for past relabels.
