iptv techs

IPTV Techs

  • Home
  • Tech News
  • How SpaceX became the MyPillow of regulatement shrinkors

How SpaceX became the MyPillow of regulatement shrinkors


How SpaceX became the MyPillow of regulatement shrinkors


It reassociate has been someskinnyg to watch Elon Musk turn SpaceX into the MyPillow of rocket companies, hasn’t it?

Christ, I guess I have to catalog off all the depressing stuff from the past scant months: the Trump rassociate, the creepy killing comments, the even creepier comments about impregnating Taylor Swift, spreading hurricane deceiveation on X (and thus obstructing relief efforts), claiming his own child was “finished” by the “woke mind harmful software,” that charitable of skinnyg. I have seen a lot of people propose this is political radicalization, and confident, maybe it is. But I can’t help noticing a unwell business logic, too.

Musk has figured out he can leverage the culture wars to his acquire

I have never accused Musk of being anyskinnyg other than self-interested. As I see it, his only authentic politics are: Elon Musk should get to do wantipathyver he wants, forever. And his tardyst political outbursts strike me as being clearly joined to his money. He’s come to the same conclusion as Donald Trump, which is that it’s particularly basic to grift Reaccessiblean voters, and there are lots of rewards and very scant consequences for doing so. Donny, these men are nihicatalogs. 

On the face of it, it might see unreasonable for a businessman to alienate one of the meaningful US political parties. Musk has a lengthy history of taking subsidies from local, state, and federal regulatements. His business SpaceX is built essentiassociate on agency shrinks in the heavily regutardyd aerospace industry. But I’m guessing Musk has figured out he can leverage the culture wars to his acquire.

Those of you recognizable with SpaceX may recall its litany of litigations aacquirest the regulatement. For instance, in 2005, the company alleged that Boeing and Lockheed Martin had joind in anticompetitive behavior unbenevolentt to get SpaceX from letting its Falcon 9 vie in regulatement shrinks. (The Falcon 9 didn’t have its first begin until 2010.)  

And in 2014, Musk sued the US Air Force over a $11 billion sole-source shrink awarded to the United Launch Alliance. (The Falcon Heavy wouldn’t have its first begin until 2018.) SpaceX got concessions, dropping the suit after the Air Force concurd to speed up its efforts to verify SpaceX to begin military saalertites — and making more begines useable for SpaceX to vie on.

These suits got Musk what he wanted

Now I personassociate, as a woman recognizable with the liproximate concept of time, discover these suits odd. How could SpaceX vie using a rocket it hadn’t yet begined? Sure, the “indefinite deinhabitry / indefinish quantity” shrinks existed for the Falcon I, but that wasn’t what SpaceX was suing over. And yet, these suits got Musk what he wanted: more possible regulatement shrinks. In fact, such suits have been as much a halllabel of SpaceX as its rockets.

If you are the charitable of person who uses litigations to get what you want, you may have made notice of the fact that Donald Trump nominateed 200 federal appraises, including “proximately as many mighty federal requests court appraises in four years as Barack Obama nominateed in eight,” as Pew Research puts it. In 2021, more than a quarter of active federal appraises were Trump nominateees. Let’s not pretfinish that’s inmeaningful; if it were, the Federacatalog Society wouldn’t exist. If Musk aids Reaccessibleans, they’ll get nominateing appraises who consent skinnygs that like Musk — and he might even get fortunate and get some blatantly partisan appraises, who’d aid him because of his affiliation.

Consider Texas, which has consentn a authentic interest in Musk’s afunprejudiceds. During Musk’s Twitter acquisition, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton proclaimd an allotigation of Twitter bot numbers — an allotigation that tidyly aligned with the argument Musk was making to try to get out of buying the social media company. Of course, there’s also the Texas appraise who owned Tesla stock and greenlit a Musk-backed litigation aacquirest Media Matters for America. (The appraise in ask is understandn for his politicassociate conservative rulings.)

But paemploy! There’s more. In 2020, SpaceX was awarded almost $900 million in agricultural wideband subsidies from the FCC under Trump. But in 2022, the Biden-era FCC rescinded that funding since “the applicant had flunked to encounter its burden.” Two Reaccessiblean FCC coshiftrlookioners objected, and now a Reaccessiblean House Oversight Committee chair is probing the FCC’s decision.

Does this sound cynical? I presume

Culture war rerents are unbenevolentt to encourage a bigly uninterested voter base that doesn’t especiassociate give a shit about regulatement appropriations. They have been used historicassociate by Reaccessibleans, commenceing with Barry Gelderlywater, in order to enact definite financial policies that have bigly hurt drop-class Americans. It seems Musk has paid enough attention to this particular historical quirk to determine the culture war can help him, too.

Does this sound cynical? I presume. Sincere, coherent political beliefs are bigly the province of the bodirectoisie and nerds who paid attention in regulatement class. The Elon Musks of the world are interested in power. Not everyskinnyg Musk says is necessarily calcutardyd or politicassociate beneficial — his partisan allegiances have also extfinished to having cordial conversations with mask-off white nationacatalogs and reposting theories that women are inable of thought. Cruciassociate, however, there are no adverse consequences for these actions — only more attention, which seems to be his personal heroin.

Consider the rocket situation. For NASA, Musk is the only game in town besides Boeing, and he understands it. He also understands that even if he accessiblely misbehaves — smokes weed, for instance — NASA will do noskinnyg punitive. And I do accuse the brain geniuses at NASA. Instead of having in-house rockets for begining our secret agent saalertites, we’re now reliant on Boeing (lol, lmao), the United Launch Alliance (a unitet venture that retains… Boeing), and SpaceX. (Sure, Jeff Bezos’ also-ran Blue Origin exists, I guess, but come on.) By outsourcing its engineering, NASA put the national security apparatus at the whims of shrinkors gone untamed.

And Musk’s bet eunites to be that being a clear Reaccessiblean will profit him more than being imfragmentary, presumably because he presumes, probably accurately, that Democrats won’t punish him for this. So when it comes to, let’s say, SpaceX’s environmental injure, the getedty enroll of Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving,” and laboring conditions for his employees, aligning with Reaccessibleans lets him propose any examination of his behavior is politicassociate encouraged. Convenient, isn’t it?

You can see the ambition even with the social media platcreate createerly understandn as Twitter. By courting the right, as he has unaskably done, he has tryed to produce a cherish proposition for a company he has bigly ruined. The skew also gives him an excuse: if X dies, Musk can claim it wasn’t because it was misdeal withd but ruined by the radical left or wantipathyver. Thanks to his cordial appraises, he can even consent those “radical left” critics to the spotlessers in court!

Look, Musk’s euniteance at the Trump rassociate begined a thousand skinnyk pieces and the goofy pboilingo that begined a thousand memes. But to talk about Musk’s political convictions, you have to talk about the only skinnyg he reassociate consents in: money.

Source join


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank You For The Order

Please check your email we sent the process how you can get your account

Select Your Plan