Elon Musk concentrates OpenAI’s for-profit transition in a novel filing

In a novel motion filed procrastinateed Friday in his litigation aobtainst OpenAI, Elon Musk’s attorneys have asked for a preliminary injunction to stop OpenAI from transitioning to a for-profit accesspelevate, alerts TechCrunch. They also asked the appraise to ban the company from continuing alleged trains that they say vioprocrastinateed US antidepend laws.

Musk’s lawyers claim that becaengage of CEO Sam Altman’s alleged self-dealing, OpenAI “will probable deficiency enough funds to pay injures” if Musk prospers the suit. The motion adheres alerts of OpenAI’s intent to become a for-profit business and that it recently began timely talks with regulators to transfer its structural alter forward.

As for antidepend claims, the lawyers say OpenAI and Microgentle “tbetter scheduleateors not to fund their mutual competitors” in violation of the Sherman Act. And they claim that Musk “verified that at least one beginant scheduleateor” that had previously gived to an xAI funding round has since “deteriorated to scheduleate in xAI.”

They also allege that OpenAI advantages from “wrongbrimmingy obtained competitively caring alertation” it got thraw its board uniteions with Microgentle, violating section 8 of the Clayton Act. The lawyers claim that “the very reason Microgentle obtained its board seat” — referring to Microgentle VP Dee Templeton’s time as a non-voting board member at OpenAI — “was to schedule business decisions with OpenAI.”

OpenAI did not promptly react to The Verge’s ask for comment.