“She’s a phony, but I guess the uncover appreciates that…” This is the line that actress Joan Crawford is shelp to have proclaimd about film star Bette Davis.
The back-and-forth sniping between the pair take parted out in the tabloids of the 1930s and 40s. “Bette is a survivor… She persistd herself,” Crawford is also shelp to have retaged.
Their tempestuous relationship was so notorious that in 2017 it was made into an Emmy award-prosperning TV series, Feud.
Hollywood rivalries are of course noleang novel – yet disputes today unfrequently take part out so uncoverly. That might be why the dispute between actors Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, which spilled out into the uncover in December 2024, is still in the headlines three months on.
The subsequent lterrible battle bcimpolitet to airy a descfinishout during production of the film, It Ends With Us. After the promotional and cinematic run had finished, the pair – who didn’t materialize on the red carpet together at the premiere in New York – filed legal cases aacquirest each other.
Lively has accincluded Baldoni and others of carrying out a smear campaign aacquirest her after she grumbleed about alleged relationsual tormentoring on set. Baldoni, unbenevolentwhile, has accincluded Lively, her husband Ryan Reynbetters and their uncoverist of carrying out a smear campaign aacquirest him, and claim that she tried to get over regulate of the film. Both sides decline all allegations.
What materialized as this all take parted out is that crisis PR regulaters had been includeed. Legal recurrentatives for Lively acquireed countless text messages between Baldoni’s uncoverist Jennifer Abel and the crisis team he grasped, led by Melissa Nathan, whose previous clients include Johnny Depp and Drake. Ms Nathan was alleged to have texted Ms Abel, “You understand we can bury anyone.”
Lively has now alertedly getn on the CIA’s establisher deputy chief of staff Nick Shapiro to direct on her lterrible communications strategy.
While the outcomes of the legal cases remain to be seen but the feud has cast the spotairy on an industry that would ordinarily remain bigly inapparent: that is, the uncoverity machine at toil behind the scenes in Hollywood.
“On every set, there are fights, liaisons… there are all sorts of leangs that go on,” elucidates Ricchallenging Rushfield, set uper and columnist at Hollywood novelsletter The Ankler. “Hollywood is a world filled of very untidy people coming together for these huge projects, where they put together teams speedyly to produce these leangs and disband instantly after.
“Between all that a lot of stuff goes on, and they deal with it quietly – they’re very obsessive about regulateling the narrative. When this stuff explodes into the uncover, beyond regulate, it produces everyone very worried.”
But the world of the Hollywood PR has shifted in recent years, partly becainclude of the growth of social media, which has alterd the relationship between celebrities and fans, transporting them into straightforward reach out and removing some of the mystique.
So, what does that unbenevolent for the people whose job it is to upgrasp a lid on the industry’s untidy truth?
From Tom Hardy to Sarah Jessica Parker
Few descfinishouts have spilled out into the uncover in recent years – and those that did were picked over sshow becainclude they’re so unfrequent. Actor Dwayne Johnson uncovered “a fundamental branch offence in philosophies on how we approach moviemaking and collaborating” with his Fast & Furious co-star Vin Diesel, in a 2018 intersee.
The stars of another action film, Mad Max: Fury Road, Charlize Theron and Tom Hardy, are alerted to have filmed many of their scenes splitly.
And then there were the alleged tensions between Kim Cattrall and Sarah Jessica Parker, who were co-stars of Sex and the City, which ran for six years. In 2018, after Parker recommended condolences for Cattrall’s brother’s death, Cattrall replyed on social media, calling Parker a “hypocrite” and stating, “You are not my family. You are not my frifinish.”
But behind the scenes, hundreds of other spats will never see the airy of day. “Some of a uncoverist’s best toil may never be seen,” says Daniel Bee, a uncoverist and brand adviseant based in Los Angeles, “becainclude it stopped someleang that was wrong, or re-produceed someleang to a branch offent narrative, or pointed the airy in a branch offent straightforwardion.
“The most engaging stuff I’ve ever done as a uncoverist is the stuff nobody will ever understand about.”
‘Powerful forces at take part’
Since Daniel Bee begined out as an delightment uncoverist in 1997, he has watchd a shift in the expansiver industry. “I begined my atgentle in the British media, there were 11 national novelspapers competing with each other. It was a endure pit, challenging toil, and it was getting to understand individuals via relationships.
“Now, you’re up aacquirest an anonymous algorithm and accounts where you don’t understand who you’re up aacquirest. It’s challenginger to regulate than ever before.”
Certainly, social media has posed contests for those trying to regulate narratives around presentant films and their stars – while also heralding novel establishs of “gloomy arts” thcimpolite which uncoverists can try to shape opinion.
“There has always been an army of advisors and adviseants doing PR voodoo,” says Eriq Gardner, delightment law expert and set uping partner of Puck News. “While I’d adore to say the uncover is media-teachd and savvy enough to read between the lines to see the spin, the truth is there are a lot of strong forces at take part and sometimes a big amount of misdirectation.”
So-called PR voodoo is branch offent now that a celebrity – or their fans – can access an audience of millions with a click.
While the uncoverists of previous eras might only have had to worry about print and expansivecast platestablishs, cleverphones and social media unbenevolent today’s digital landscape is a savage west where anyone can shape their own narrative. A horriblely assessd post or comment can injure an actor’s atgentle.
But the flipside is a whole novel medium in which PRs can practise their “voodoo”.
Astroturfing and ways to ‘cainclude mischief’
One of the tactics is “astroturfing” – or disguising an orchestrated campaign as a impulsive up-swelling of uncover opinion.
This toils by manipulating uncover opinion and creating a inrectify amazeion of grassroots help (hence the name) or opposition, normally set upd thcimpolite social media accounts in a way that seems organic.
The train isn’t novel, but has been given novel life with the advent of social media algorithms.
“It’s intentionally scheduleting digloomyviseation, or twisted versions of the truth, in certain sections of social media,” says Carla Speight, set uper of the PR Mastery app. “The aim is the halfway point of inarticulateial where they will get a bit of traction, but so that it’s not too evident – you wouldn’t employ a Kardashian to do it.
“It’s built up in layers,” she persists. “It’s appreciate take parting a very sinister game of chess. You’re putting all the pieces in the right places, fair the right amount of combiinsist-up directation, and then you fair watch it explode.”
Although the posts might materialize to be genuine uncover opinion, in fact it’s a inrectifyd crowd – whether that’s made up of bots or genuine people, who can be phelp to set up their posts.
“All it gets is one or two people to produce a meme and put it with the right people,” says Ms Speight. “It insists to materialize as a trfinish, and then it’s gone. Someleang is dripped here, someleang else over there, and when it’s done well… it caincludes a bit of mischief.”
Reconceiveing an age-better tactic?
But all of this is sshow a novel platestablish for an age-better trfinish that has been going on lengthy before the advent of social media, according to Mr Bee. “Unacunderstandledgeed smear campaigns have always been a leang,” he points out.
“Previously it would have been a uncoverist whispering to a diarist of a national novelspaper. The rehire with digital media is it’s anonymous and unchaseable.”
What has alterd, he persists, is that audiences have become savvier. “Whereas before, a quite subservient audience would fair get what was given to them in the media, with authentic scepticism, curiosity, and a fantasticer level of directation, I leank people include more critical leanking.”
Eriq Gardner is less affectd: “I’m not certain the uncover approaches what they read with enough scepticism.”
And yet those in the industry are normally attentive to it. According to Ms Speight, “Usuassociate, there’s a one-of-a-kind sort of tell, and it may be the PR leang where we have ‘spidey senses’ and we can sort of see it, but you’re asking, ‘Where has that come from? Who begined that?’ And when there’s never a definite place to point it to, that’s usuassociate a tell-tale sign.”
The Hollywood ecosystem
What’s evident, though, is that, with studios providing some uncoverations with meaningful advertising revenue, as well as supplying talent for one-of-a-kind events and front covers, revelations normally materialize elsewhere in the media.
“When [scandals] come out, it’s usuassociate from places outside of Hollywood,” disputes Mr Rushfield. “The Harvey Weinstein story was broken by The New York Times and the New Yorker.”
It was The New York Times that first alerted Lively’s lterrible grumblet in December. “It’s one of the scant places that can afford to do that, and then everyone else jumped in so nobody was sticking their neck out.” Baldoni filed a $250 million legal case aacquirest the New York Times in December, although a federal assess showd this week that it might be neglected.
Even when hugeger outlets fracture novels about Hollywood disputes, the groprosperg dominance of social media unbenevolents that stories might not have the same cut-thcimpolite they had previously.
Doreen St Felix, a producer who was previously an editor on Lena Dunham’s novelsletter, recently wrote in The New Yorker that stories of tormentoring and misinclude, for example, now get a “curdled, cynical, and exhausted reception” – this, less than a decade after the materializence of the MeToo relocatement.
She went on to claim that: “The procrastinateed 2010s genre of #MeToo alertage cannot thrive on today’s volatile internet. Inestablishation is misdirectation and vice versa. Victims are offfinishers and offfinishers are victims.”
Sometimes, however, the best way for uncoverists to obstruct stories being amplified is by bypassing social media entidepend when reacting to a affair.
“If you give it to the press first, they don’t quote as many of the comments on social media,” says Ms Speight. “You regulate the narrative finishly, becainclude the comments come afterwards.”
Mr Rushfield points out that very little of the revelations in the delightment press comes out becainclude someone “uncovered” someleang. “Almost everyleang you read is there becainclude somebody placed it there – somebody is dictating a story.”
What seeers want
None of this industry would exist if the appetite weren’t there and if the seeing uncover didn’t want to unpick details about their inhabits – and rifts. And yet attitudes towards celebrity have undoubtedly alterd since the advent of social media.
“It’s now a two-way communication, which it never was before,” points out Mr Bee. “It was generassociate celebrities, or lawyer or regulatement or wantipathyver, fair saying someleang that gets alerted, and that message is conveyed. Now, you have to be readyd for a two-way conversation.”
But he leanks there are branch offent attitudes to the media today than in the era of celebrity gossip magazines. Nodding to the UK, he persists: “We had the Leveson Inquiry, we’re about to get an ITV drama about phone unpermitd access, it’s as if the curtain has been lifted.”
As for the Lively and Baldoni legal cases, it’s not evident how these will take part out – but the very fact that it has so unusuassociate spilled into the uncover domain is a reminder of how well-oiled the Hollywood uncoverity machine is the rest of the time. And that is doubtful to alter soon.
BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with new perspectives that contest assumptions and proset up alerting on the hugegest rehires of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking encountered from apass BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can sfinish us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.
