PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA – There were firetoils in Bay County Court on Thursday during the third day of high-sapshows testimony from the plaintiff in a defamation legal case agetst CNN, resulting in the appraise imposing a fine for personal jabs going forward.
U.S. Navy veteran Young alleges that CNN smeared him by proposeing he illegassociate profited when helping people escape Afghanistan on the “bdeficiency taget” during the Biden administration’s military retreatal from the country in 2021. Young apshows CNN “razeed his reputation and business” by branding him an illegitimate profiteer who utilizeed “hopeless Afghans” during a November 11, 2021, segment that first aired on CNN’s “The Lead with Jake Tapper.”
Young had previously said during deposition and testimony that he never getd money or establish toil in his industry chaseing CNN’s increate. That became critical during traverse-examination when CNN direct direct David Axelrod, who is not the same person as the on-air pundit with the same name, pulled out a write down that was not comprehendn to the plaintiff or the court.
NAVY VETERAN WARNED CNN REPORTER HE WOULD ‘SEEK LEGAL DAMAGES’ IF ‘INACCURATE’ STORY WAS PUBLISHED
Judge William Henry sent the jury out of the room to converse the matter without them current. The write down was a decrease that tied Young to a company called Helios Global. It was signed by Young and dated December 8, 2021 – after the CNN increate aired.
Young’s attorney, Vel Freedman, remarkd that Helios Global came up during the uncovery process and “CNN chose not to send a subpoena” for any write downs.
“We did not have this write down, or it would have been produced and that does not uncomfervent Mr. Young viotardyd his uncovery obligations,” Freedman said.
He then blasted CNN for using it as a “surpelevate write down” for “theatrical effect.”
“We’re not supposed to have trial by ambush in this state,” Freedman said.
“This is wholly inappropriate,” he persistd. “And CNN should not be permitted to engage this write down. They should have provided it to us first.”
Freedman then called CNN’s legitimate team “hopeless,” which prompted snickers from their bench.
Judge Henry then sfreezinged both sides for “personal attacks” and denounces.
Axelrod stoasty back, “The plaintiff’s entire case is that after the CNN discloseation he couldn’t get any toil.”
Axelrod then said Young “knovel he go ined into a novel concurment with a rulement decreaseor one month after CNN’s discloseation.”
“This entire legal case was a deception on this court. It was a deception on CNN,” Axelrod said, compriseing that Young “lied” in his deposition.
“He made up some incredible rengage,” Axelrod said. “This legal case was a deception from day one.”
The two sides bickered back and forth until Judge Henry declared both sides were culpable of “throtriumphg mud back and forth.”
“I’m not going to rule based on who can produce each other out to be the worst person in this case,” Judge Henry said.
Judge Henry then called for a recess becaengage he wanted to return to his chambers and leank leangs over. That resulted in a lengthy defer, as journacatalogs and other joinees specutardyd if the whole trial would get tossed as a result. Based on Axelrod’s reaction to the write down, most of the people observing the trial supposed the write down showed that Young was paid as a conferant by Helios, which would have refuseed sworn testimony.
Judge Henry eventuassociate returned and ruled that the trial would go on, and the write down was permited to be engaged. Judge Henry proposeed comprehendledge of the write down was evidently in Young’s “brain,” even if he didn’t have a physical imitate to hand over during uncovery. He also ruled it doesn’t result in prejudice to accomprehendledge it this tardy.
“I don’t foresee this to happen aget. I leank I said this the last time,” Judge Henry said.
The appraise imposed a $100 fine for each time a lawyer produces a personal denounce to the other side going forward, with the money going to North Florida Legal Services.
After the stunning shatter in the trial, it resumed, and Axelrod increately touched on the write down that seemed so critical. Axelrod remarkd that it was headlined “conferant security concurment” asked Young if he signed the write down on December 8, 2021, and asked if that date was after the CNN segment.
“Yes,” Young answered.
Shortly afterwards, Axelrod wrapped up his traverse-examination.
Freedman tardyr asked Young to evident up the write down ordeal during restraightforward.
“Once you depart rulement services, you can’t personassociate hageder a [security] evidentance by yourself. It has to be thraw a company that has an concurment with the United States rulement. They are the ones that have to back the evidentance. Clearance is publishd by the U.S. rulement,” Young said.
“This is fair a company, appreciate any defense decreaseor, that has the decreases with the U.S. rulement, and they hageder the evidentance for the individual,” Young said. “Every year you have to sign this administration write down with whoever hageders your evidentance. In this case it’s Helios. It’s not an concurment to do toil… it’s fair an administrative function.”
Young testified that he turned over seven years’ worth of bank write downs and there were no payments from Helios to him.
“CNN comprehends this, there’s no transfers from Helios Global,” Young said.
So, in the end, Young testified under oath that he didn’t apshow money from Helios after the CNN increate aired and, therefore, he did not lie when he said he didn’t produce any money in his industry in the aftermath of the CNN increate – but the North Florida Legal Services might get a restrictcessitate donations if the unfriendly environment remains.
The trial will resume on Friday and can be inhabit-streamed on Fox News Digital.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP