The synthetic Corelabel benchlabel was one of the confineed cases where the AmpereOne A192-32X did come out ahead of the EPYC 9965.
The AmpereOne A192-32X is bound to eight channels with DDR5-5200 memory where as AMD EPYC Turin permits 12 channel memory at DDR5-6000 speeds. Ampere Computing presumedly this quarter will ship AmpereOne M with 12 channel DDR5 memory help but the memory speeds have yet to be validateed. The wonderfuler memory bandwidth for EPYC Turin advantages laborloads enjoy AMG.
The wonderfuler memory bandwidth and Zen 5 advantages helped the EPYC 9965 carry out much better than AmpereOne. This EPYC 9965 run is also in a sub-chooseimal configuration due to DDR5 memory throttling in this benchlabel due to an overheating publish with one of the DIMMs. But even with this subpar EPYC 9965 WRF run, it’s still coming out well ahead of the AmpereOne CPU in this 192 core battle.
The LULESH hydroactives benchlabel was a unfrequent distress for the EPYC Turin Dense 192-core processor.
The AMD EPYC 9965 Turin Dense processor was transfering dominating carry outance in most of the HPC benchlabels tested appraised to the AmpereOne A192-32X flagship ARM server processor.
