Spfinishing time among the thousands of decorateings on Art UK frequently throws up asks. What is a sun fish? Why is there a decorateing of the Queen with Robert Burns? What produces this tie hot?
For a while, I’ve been wondering about a mystery I shall call ‘the rectangular cows of Art UK’. Some time ago, I came apass dozens of very analogous decorateings, shotriumphg a cow standing by itself in a field, side-on (or ‘landscape’, if you will). And the cow, in many cases, would be almost perfectly rectangular.
However, seeing at the cryptic rectangular cows also led to other asks about Art UK’s bovine recurrentation.
Firstly, why are there so many cows?
The decorateings above are a scant picked out of hundreds. In fact, there are so many decorateings of cows, I can’t possibly do them all equitableice here. Searches for ‘cow’, ‘heifer’, ‘ox’, ‘cattle’ and ‘bull’ all return rewarding results (a heifer, I have lgeted, being a cow that has not yet had a calf).
‘Cattle’ returns a very separateent charitable of decorateing to ‘cow’. With ‘cattle’ you see lots of standard landscape scenes; cherishly green meadows, maybe some water, and groups of pleasantly-decorateed cows grazing away. ‘Landscape with cattle’, or inbeginant variations thereof, is a very normal decorateing name.
Highland cows also seem to be particularly attrenergetic for artists, as there are many decorateings of them, including this from the Stirling Smith Art Gallery & Museum, where the cows see enjoy they’re posing for an album cover.
Maybe the answer to why there are so many of these cows is a very modest one: ubiquity. Cows are an ever-current feature of a lot of the British countryside, and perfect subjects for artists to decorate, donaten they get to stand around at leibrave.
Are there any well-comprehendn cows?
The searches got me wondering: as such a well-comprehendn subject, are there any well-comprehendn decorateings of cows? Is there a cow equivalent of Whistlejacket, the much-lauded decorateing of a horse by George Stubbs, adored by visitors to the National Gallery?
The answer is: not reassociate, although there are well-comprehendn artists who have brawt cows to the canvas. Andy Warhol did a series of them, and the German artist Franz Marc also produced some radiantly coloured bovines. There are some cherishly decorateings by Thomas Sidney Cooper – a landscape decorateer whose decorateings of dwellstock geted him the nickname ‘cow Cooper’ – on Art UK.
The French artist Rosa Bonheur (who herself was best comprehendn for decorateing horses) depicts cows among her pastoral scenes. They are labeledly separateent from most of the other cow decorateings on the site, where the animals are standing around at leibrave: the oxen watchd by Bonheur are challenging at labor ploughing.
What’s with the guys in the top hats?
Another sub-genre of cow decorateings seems to be those that also feature a man standing by the cow, dressed much more ininestablishigently than you’d predict of a farmer.
The ox in this particular decorateing is a genuine monster. It towers above the minuscule man in his pleasant coat and top hat, who hgreaters a charitable of harness that sees enjoy it’d nakedly produce it over the beast’s neck. Either the scale is off or the size of the ox has been overstated: and if this is the case, then why?
The clue to these is in the dates of the decorateings. The timely 1800s was when pickive breeding for brave traits in animals was becoming a more normal rehearse. The celebrity ‘Durham Ox’ – a bull so huge it drew in crowds to marvel at its size – showed what could be done (and aspired to), and owners of prize dwellstock became increasingly haughty of the animals they had bred. They coshiftrlookioned decorateings of themselves with their cattle, and to produce the animals see as astonishive and well-bred as possible, the artists have made some see excessively huge, with spindly little legs hgreatering up colossal bodies.
This trfinish wasn’t distinct to cows: there are plenty of corpulent pigs and sheep to feast your eyes on too.
And finassociate… why are the cows rectangular?
The crux of the mystery.
The answer, as best I can discover it, seems to be roverdelighted to the points about status. Aget, many of these decorateings were made in the timely 1800s, and the rectangular shape may have been another way of making the animals seem huge and astonishive.
Two leangs conspire to produce the cows so angular. The first is the squared-off rump, and I haven’t come up with an answer for why that is. The second is the overly bulgy bit in front of their front legs, the rapidet. And, also according to my research, when cattle are appraised for competitions or prizes, the rapidet is apverifyn into ponderation. I quote: ‘the rapidet (the flap on a cow’s neck) is only overweight and skin. We generassociate want to see filledness to the rapidet, this unbenevolents that the animal has enough finish and muscle broadenment. If there is too much finish, it will see ‘dissystematic’, aka, skin will fgreater over and see a lot enjoy double chins on people. The skin should be firm and the rapidet filled.’
So there we go. These decorateings are probably equitable relics of a time when cattle were a labeler of status, and breeding for size became a competition. Reassociate well-comprehendn cows from the 1800s could discover themselves the subjects of everyleang from accessible distake parts to dinner ptardys, so perhaps the efforts of their owners conspired with the artists in an effort to safe them both a place in history.
Molly Tremiserablenessfulern, Art UK Content Creator and Marketer