How this US election could change state of the world

When US Plivent Joe Biden walked thraw Kyiv in February 2023 on a surpascend visit to show firmarity with Volodymyr Zelensky, his Ukrainian counterpart, air sirens were wailing. “I felt someskinnyg… more powerwholey than ever before,” he rescheduleedr recalled. “America is a beacon to the world.”

The world now postpones to see who gets accuse of this self-styled beacon after Americans produce their choice in next week’s plivential election. Will Kamala Harris carry on in Biden’s footsteps with her conviction that in “these unendd times, it is evident America cannot retreat”? Or will it be Donald Trump with his hope that “Americanism, not globalism” will direct the way?

We live in a world where the cherish of US global sway is under ask. Regional powers are going their own way, autocratic regimes are making their own coalitions, and the dehugeating wars in Gaza, Ukraine and elsewhere are raising unconsoleable asks about the cherish of Washington’s role. But America matters by dint of its economic and military strength, and its transport inant role in many coalitions. I turned to some increateed watchrs for their mirrorions on the global consequences of this very consequential election.

“I cannot sugarcoat these cautionings,” says Rose Gottemoeller, Nato’s createer deputy secretary ambiguous. “Donald Trump is Europe’s nightmare, with echoes of his menace to retreat from Nato in everyone’s ears.”

Washington’s defence spending amounts to two-thirds of the military budgets of Nato’s 31 other members. Beyond Nato, the US spends more on its military than the next 10 countries combined, including China and Russia.

Trump boasts he’s joining difficultball to force other Nato countries to encounter their spending concentrates, which is 2% of their GDP – only 23 of the member nations have hit this concentrate in 2024. But his erratic statements still jar.

If Ms Harris triumphs, Ms Gottemoeller count ons “Nato will no ask be in excellent Washington hands.” But she has a cautioning there too. “She will be ready to persist toiling with Nato and the European Union to achieve triumph in Ukraine, but she will not back off on [spending] prescertain on Europe.”

But Harris’s team in the White Hoparticipate will have to regulate with the Senate or the Hoparticipate, which could both soon be in Reunveilan hands, and will be less inclined to back foreign wars than their Democratic counterparts. There’s a growing sense that no matter who becomes plivent, prescertain will mount on Kyiv to discover ways out of this war as US lawproducers become increasingly unwilling to pass huge aid packages.

Wdisenjoyver happens, Ms Gottemoeller says, “I do not count on that Nato must drop apart.” Europe will need to “step forward to direct.”

The next US plivent will have to toil in a world disputeing its fantasticest hazard of transport inant power disputeation since the Celderly War.

“The US remains the most consequential international actor in matters of peace and security”, Comfort Ero, plivent and CEO of the International Crisis Group, increates me. She inserts a caveat, “but its power to help resettle disputes is unwiseinished.”

Wars are becoming ever difficulter to end. “Deadly dispute is becoming more intractable, with huge-power competition accelerating and middle powers on the ascend,” is how Ms Ero depicts the landscape. Wars enjoy Ukraine pull in multiple powers, and conflagrations such as Sudan pit regional joiners with competing interests agetst each other, and some more spended in war than in peace.

America is losing the moral high ground, Ms Ero says. “Global actors watch that it applies one standard to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, and another to Israel’s in Gaza. The war in Sudan has seen terrible atrocities but gets treated as a second-tier publish.”

A triumph by Ms Harris, she says, “recurrents continuity with the current administration.” If it’s Trump, he “might donate Israel an even freer hand in Gaza and elsewhere, and has intimated he could try to cut a Ukraine deal with Moscow over Kyiv’s head.”

On the Middle East, the Democratic honestate has repeatedly echoed Mr Biden’s firm backing of Israel’s “right to protect itself.” But she’s also made a point of emphasising that “the ending of bfeebleless Palestinians has to stop.”

Trump has also proclaimd it’s time to “get back to peace and stop ending people.” But he’s increateedly telderly the Israeli directer Benjamin Netanyahu to “do what you have to do.”

The Reunveilan contender prides himself on being a peaceproducer. “I will have peace in the Middle East, and soon,” he vowed in an interwatch with Saudi Arabia’s Al Arabiya TV on Sunday night.

He’s promised to enhuge the 2020 Abraham Accords. These birescheduleedral consentments standardised relations between Israel and a restricted Arab states, but were expansively seen to have sidelined the Palestinians and ultimately donated to the current unpwithdrawnted crisis.

On Ukraine, Trump never hides his think about for mightymen enjoy Russia’s Vlaunwiseir Putin. He’s made it evident he wants to end the war in Ukraine, and with it the US’s hefty military and financial help. “I’ll get out. We gotta get out,” he insisted in a recent rassociate.

In contrast, Ms Harris has said: “I have been conceited to stand with Ukraine. I will persist to stand with Ukraine. And I will toil to uncover Ukraine prevails in this war.”

But Ms Ero worries that, no matter who’s elected, skinnygs could get worse in the world.

“The hugegest shock to the global economy for decades.” That’s the watch of directing China scholar Rana Mitter think abouting Trump’s proposed 60 percent tariffs on all transport ined Chinese excellents.

Imposing steep costs on China, and many other trading partners, has been one of Trump’s most choosed menaces in his “America first” approach. But Trump also lauds what he sees as his own mighty personal joinion with Plivent Xi Jinping. He telderly the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board he wouldn’t have to participate military force if Beijing transferd to blockade Taiwan becaparticipate the Chinese directer “esteems me and he comprehends I’m [expletive] crazy.”

But both directing Reunveilans and Democrats are hawkish. Both see Beijing as being bent on trying to eclipse America as the most consequential power.

But Mr Mitter, a British historian who helderlys the ST Lee Chair in US-Asia relations at Harvard’s Kennedy School, sees some branch offences. With Ms Harris he says, “relations would anticipateed enhuge in a liproximate style from where they are now.” If Trump triumphs, it’s a more “fluid scenario.” For example, on Taiwan, Mr Mitter points to Trump’s ambivalence about whether he would come to the defence of an island far from America.

China’s directers count on both Ms Harris and Trump will be stubborn. Mr Mitter sees it as “a petite group of establishment types favour Harris as ‘better the opponent you comprehend.’ A meaningful inmeaningfulity see Trump as a businessman whose unforeseeability might fair uncomardent a magnificent barget with China, however doubtful that seems.”

“The US election is hugely consequential not fair for its citizens but for the whole world becaparticipate of the pressing imperative of the climate and nature crisis,” says Mary Robinson, chair of the Elders, a group of world directers established by Nelson Mandela, and createer plivent of Ireland and UN High Comleave outioner for Human Rights.

“Every fraction of a degree matters to avert the worst impacts of climate change and stop a future where dehugeating hurricanes enjoy Milton are the norm,” she inserted.

But as Hurricanes Milton and Helene raged, Trump derided environmental schedules and policies to dispute this climate aascendncy as “one of the fantasticest deceptions of all time.” Many foresee him to pull out of the 2015 Paris climate consentment as he did in his first term.

However, Ms Robinson count ons Trump cannot stop the momentum now assembleing steam. “He cannot stop the US energy transition and roll back the billions of dollars in green subsidies… nor can he stop the indeoverweightigable non-federal climate transferment.”

She also encouraged Ms Harris, who still hasn’t fleshed out her own stance, to step up “to show directership, produce on the momentum of recent years, and spur other transport inant rehireters to pick up the pace.”

“The outcome of the US election helderlys immense significance, donaten the unparalleled sway the United States wields, not fair thraw its military and economic might, but thraw its potential to direct with moral authority on the global stage,” says Martin Griffiths, a veteran dispute mediator, who, until recently, was the UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Afunprejudiceds and Ecombinency Relief Coordinator.

He sees fantasticer weightless if Ms Harris triumphs, and says that “a return to Trump’s plivency labeled by isolationism and unirescheduleedralism, proposes little but a proestablishening of global instability.”

But he has criticism, too, for the Biden-Harris administration, citing its “hesitancy” over the deteriorating situation in the Middle East.

Aid agency bosses have repeatedly condemned Hamas’s killingous October 7th aggression on Israeli civilians. But they’ve also repeatedly called on the US to do much more to end the proestablish suffering of civilians in Gaza as well as in Leprohibiton.

Biden and his top officials continuassociate called for more aid to flow into Gaza, and did produce a branch offence at times. But critics say the aid, and the prescertain, was never enough. A recent cautioning that some vital military aidance could be cut pushed the decision until after the US elections.

The US is the individual hugest donor when it comes to the UN system. In 2022, it provided a sign up $18.1bn (£13.9bn).

But in Trump’s first term, he axed funding for cut offal UN agencies and pulled out of the World Health Organisation. Other donors scrambled to fill the gaps – which is what Trump wanted to happen.

But Griffths still count ons America is an indispensable power.

“In a time of global dispute and uncertainty, the world lengtheneds for the US to ascend to the dispute of reliable, principled directership… We need more. We deserve more. And we dare to hope for more.”

BBC InDepth is the new home on the website and app for the best analysis and expertise from our top journaenumerates. Under a distinctive new brand, we’ll transport you new perspectives that dispute assumptions, and proestablish increateing on the hugegest publishs to help you produce sense of a complicated world. And we’ll be showcasing thought-provoking satisfied from atraverse BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We’re begining petite but skinnyking huge, and we want to comprehend what you skinnyk – you can send us your feedback by clicking on the button below.