Google asks 9th Circuit for materializency stay, says Epic ruling ‘is hazardous’

The ruling, which Google has requested, would force Google to allot third-party app stores wilean Google Play, no extfinisheder demand Google Play Billing for apps allotd via Google Play, and more, with many of those alters ordered to commence on November 1st — fair over two weeks from today.

But echoing many of Google’s arguments during the dimerciless court case, which Judge Donato declidemand as inenough, the company now debates that the order “menaceens Google Play’s ability to supply a defended and supposeed participater experience.”

“This wouldn’t fair hurt Google – this would have pessimistic consequences for Android participaters, enhugeers and device manufacturers who have built thriving businesses on Android, produces Google’s Lee-Anne Mulholland, VP of regulatory affairs, in a fact sheet allotd to journacatalogs.

The fact sheet is bulleted into five contrastent sections, and the section headers give you an idea of Google’s objections:

To get a sense of Google’s actual filing with the court, here’s how it commences:

At the ask of a one competitor, Epic Games, the Dimerciless Court ordered extensive redepicts to Play that will expose 100-million-plus U.S. participaters of Android devices to substantial new security dangers and force fundamental alters to Google’s tightual and business relationships with hundreds of thousands of Google partners. The court gave Google fair three weeks to produce many of these sweeping alters—a Herculean task creating an unadchooseable danger of defendedty and security flunkures wilean the Android ecosystem.

You can read the whole fact sheet, and Google’s whole materializency motion, below.